Article 2018

Academic Engagement and Student Success: Do High-Impact Practices Mean Higher Graduation Rates?

Journal of Higher Education
Journal · Vol. 89 · Issue 5 · pp. 753-781
Abstract

This study examined the relationship between 10 high-impact practices and graduation rates at four-year public colleges and universities in the United States. The Association of American Colleges and Universities defined high-impact practices as especially effective for student learning, engagement, and career preparation in the 21st century. While advocacy for these practices and their inclusion in undergraduate curricula is growing, little research has examined their relationship to institutional outcomes. Based on data from 101 participating institutions, this study used both primary and secondary data to investigate whether offering high-impact practices as required for all students, required for some students, or optional was related to an institution’s four or six-year graduation rate. The findings suggest that high-impact practices are in widespread use across different institutional types but have limited relationships with graduation rates. This study contributes to the body of literature on college completion. Findings suggest that offering high-impact practices may not lead to increased graduation rates at public institutions. ©, © The Ohio State University.

Keywords

Author Keywords

high-impact practices Academic engagement college completion

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Research Institute, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, United States
Higher and Postsecondary Education Program, New York University, New York, NY, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Student Persistence in College More than Counting Caps and Gowns Item Number 36 0702, (2003)
2 Academically Adrift Limited Learning on College Campuses, (2011)
3 Journal of College Student Personnel, (1984)
4 What Matters in College Four Critical Years Revisited, (1993)
5 Bangert-Drowns, Robert L., The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 74, 1, pp. 29-58, (2004)
6 undefined, (2015)
7 Bean, John P., Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition, Research in Higher Education, 12, 2, pp. 155-187, (1980)
8 Service Learning in Higher Education Around the World an Initial Look, (1999)
9 Concept Paper Seattle Wa, (2010)
10 Binder, Jens F., The academic value of internships: Benefits across disciplines and student backgrounds, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, pp. 73-82, (2015)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
94
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers