Article Gold Open Access 2018

Benefit-cost analysis of undergraduate education programs: An example analysis of the freshman research initiative

CBE Life Sciences Education
Journal · Vol. 17 · Issue 1 · Art. rm1
Abstract

Institutions and administrators regularly have to make difficult choices about how best to invest resources to serve students. Yet economic evaluation, or the systematic analysis of the relationship between costs and outcomes of a program or policy, is relatively uncommon in higher education. This type of evaluation can be an important tool for decision makers considering questions of resource allocation. Our purpose with this essay is to describe methods for conducting one type of economic evaluation, a benefit-cost analysis (BCA), using an example of an existing undergraduate education program, the Freshman Research Initiative (FRI) at the University of Texas Austin. Our aim is twofold: to demonstrate how to apply BCA methodologies to evaluate an education program and to conduct an economic evaluation of FRI in particular. We explain the steps of BCA, including assessment of costs and benefits, estimation of the benefit-cost ratio, and analysis of uncertainty. We conclude that the university’s investment in FRI generates a positive return for students in the form of increased future earning potential. © 2018 R. L. Walcott et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education and 2018 The American Society for Cell Biology.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

human Humans Students student university Universities economics cost benefit analysis research Decision trees decision tree economic model Cost-Benefit Analysis Models, Economic
Author Affiliations
Department of Health Policy and Management, Terry College of Business, Athens, GA, United States
College of Natural Sciences, Austin, TX, United States
Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Athens, GA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, HHMI
Grant: 52006958
We thank Lauren Crowe, Cassandra Delgado-Reyes, and Marty Mass for providing cost information. Support for FRI was provided by a grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (#52006958). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of HHMI.
References 10 References
1 Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, (1985)
2 Future of Children, (1993)
3 Beckham, Josh T., The Freshman Research Initiative as a Model for Addressing Shortages and Disparities in STEM Engagement, Directions for Mathematics Research Experience for Undergraduates, pp. 181-212, (2015)
4 undefined, (2014)
5 College Payoff Education Occupations Lifetime Earnings, (2011)
6 Coppola, Brian P., Full human presence: A guidepost to mentoring undergraduate science students, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001, 85, pp. 57-73, (2001)
7 Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, (1997)
8 Prevention Effectiveness A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation, (2003)
9 Recruitment Retention in Higher Education, (2008)
10 Major Decisions What Graduates Earn Over their Lifetimes, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
13
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers