Article Gold Open Access 2017

Revisiting impact in the context of workplace research: a review and possible directions

Journal of Work-Applied Management
Journal · Vol. 9 · Issue 2 · pp. 95-109
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to revisit the scholarly impact agenda in the context of work-based and workplace research, and to propose new directions for research and practice. Design/methodology/approach: This paper combines a contemporary literature review with case vignettes and reflections from practice to develop more nuanced understandings, and highlights future directions for making sense of impact in the context of work-based learning research approaches. Findings: This paper argues that three dimensions to making sense of impact need to be more nuanced in relation to workplace research: interactional elements of workplace research processes have the potential for discursive pathways to impact, presence (and perhaps non-action) can act as a pathway to impact, and the narrative nature of time means that there is instability in making sense of impact over time. Research limitations/implications: The paper proposes a number of implications for practitioner-researchers, universities/research organisations, and focusses on three key areas: the amplification of research ethics in workplace research, the need for axiological shifts towards sustainability and the need to explicate axiological orientation in research. Originality/value: This paper offers a contemporary review of the international impact debate in the specific context of work-based and workplace research approaches. © 2017, Tony Wall, Lawrence Bellamy, Victoria Evans and Sandra Hopkins.

Keywords

Author Keywords

impact Dialogic impact Reflexive impact Research method Temporal impact Workplace research

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Centre for Work Related Studies, University of Chester, Chester, Cheshire, United Kingdom, International Thriving at Work Research Group, University of Chester, Chester, Cheshire, United Kingdom
International Thriving at Work Research Group, University of Chester, Chester, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
University of Chester
The authors would like to thank the receipt of a QR (Quality Research) Funding Grant at the University of Chester to develop this paper.
References 10 References
1 Work Applied Learning for Change, (2012)
2 Aguinis, Herman, Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13, 4, pp. 623-639, (2014)
3 Akrivou, Kleio, Educating integrated catalysts: Transforming business schools Toward ethics and sustainability, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14, 2, pp. 222-240, (2015)
4 Alvesson, Mats, Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research, Organization Studies, 35, 7, pp. 967-987, (2014)
5 Anderson, Lisa, The Impactful Academic: Relational Management Education as an Intervention for Impact, British Journal of Management, 28, 1, pp. 14-28, (2017)
6 Banks, George Christopher, Management's science-practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders, Academy of Management Journal, 59, 6, pp. 2205-2231, (2016)
7 Bartunek, Jean Marie, Beyond Lewin: Toward a Temporal Approximation of Organization Development and Change, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, pp. 157-182, (2015)
8 Birkinshaw, Julian M., The relevance gap in business school research: Which academic papers are cited in managerial bridge journals?, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15, 4, pp. 686-702, (2016)
9 Brembs, Björn, Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, JUN, (2013)
10 Brown, Tony, Desire and drive in researcher subjectivity the broken mirror of lacan, Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 3, pp. 402-423, (2008)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
26
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers