Article 2017

Examination of the Relationship of Community College Opticianry Student Outcomes with Instructional Delivery Methods and Student Age

Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Journal · Vol. 41 · Issue 9 · pp. 593-609
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether student outcomes are a function of participation in different modes of delivery and student age in an Opticianry program at the community college level. The three instructional delivery methods were traditional face-to-face instruction, online delivery, and a hybrid format where students take theory courses online and attend face-to-face laboratories on campus. Student age when entering the Opticianry program was classified in three categories: Young Adults (18–24), Middle Age (25–33), and Older Adults (34 & >). A nonexperimental explanatory research design relying on survey data collection strategies were used in the study. Data collection was conducted using an online survey. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the relationship between independent variables (delivery method and age) and a dependent variable (GPA [grade point average], national certification score, workplace preparation score, and quality of instruction score). A total of 112 graduates completed the survey, representing a response rate of 39%. The results indicated no significant differences in student outcomes, suggesting that students in the Opticianry program should achieve similar outcomes whether they complete the program online, on campus, or in a hybrid format. The results of the study provide support for the idea that it is possible to provide equivalent technician preparation using a variety of instructional delivery methods. © 2017 Taylor & Francis.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Adult, University of South Florida, Tampa, Tampa, FL, United States
Opticianry Program, Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, FL, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Going the Distance Online Education in the United States 2011, (2011)
2 Cc Stats, (2008)
3 Community College Statistics, (2009)
4 Opticianry Certification Exam, (2011)
5 Anderson, Terry Dirndorfer, Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4, 2, pp. 126-141, (2003)
6 American Journal of Distance Education, (2008)
7 Distance Learning in Postsecondary Career and Technical Education A Comparison of Achievement in Online Vs on Campus Cte Courses, (2004)
8 Cantor, Jeffrey A., Apprenticeships link community-technical colleges and business and industry for workforce training, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 19, 1, pp. 47-71, (1995)
9 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (1988)
10 Cognitive Apprenticeship Teaching the Craft of Reading Writing and Mathematics, (1987)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers