Article 2017

Dispositional Predictors of Problem Solving in the Field of Office Work

Vocations and Learning
Journal · Vol. 10 · Issue 2 · pp. 177-199
Abstract

It was investigated how domain-specific knowledge, fluid intelligence, vocational interest and work-related self-efficacy predicted domain-specific problem-solving performance in the field of office work. The participants included 100 German VET (vocational education and training) students nearing the end of a 3-year apprenticeship program as an industrial clerk (n = 63) which usually leads to a position in office work, lower or middle management, or a similar apprenticeship program to become IT-systems management assistants (n = 37). The participants worked on three computer-based problem scenarios dealing with operative controlling, a relevant domain to both training occupations, and completed further assessments to measure the variables listed above. Theoretical considerations, prior research and domain analyses suggested that industrial clerks would have greater domain-specific problem-solving competence (H1a) and domain-specific knowledge (H1b) than IT-systems management assistants and that domain-specific knowledge would be the strongest predictor of problem-solving competence (H2: “knowledge-is-power” hypothesis); all hypotheses were confirmed. Hypothesis 3, the “Elshout-Raaheim hypothesis,” predicts that fluid intelligence and problem-solving competence are most strongly correlated in the context of intermediate levels of task-related content knowledge, however the highest correlation was found in the group with low domain-specific knowledge. The findings suggest that intelligence plays a minor role in later stages of competence development whereas typical problem situations in later stages particularly require prior knowledge. The relationship of intelligence, knowledge and problem solving as well as limitations of the study, particularly weaknesses in the measurement of non-cognitive dispositions, are discussed. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Problem solving vocational education and training Intelligence computer-based assessment Domain-specific knowledge

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Business Education and Educational Management, Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Bayern, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
Grant: 01DB1119-23
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under Grant No. 01DB1119-23: ‘Modeling and assessing domain-specific problem-solving competence of industrial clerks’.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under Grant No. 01DB1119-23: ‘Modeling and assessing domain-specific problem-solving competence of industrial clerks’.
References 10 References
1 Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits Und Organisationspsychologie, (2000)
2 Abele, Stephan, Dynamic problem solving-An important predictor of problem-solving performance in technical domains?, Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 15, 2, pp. 363-391, (2012)
3 Ackerman, Phillip L., New developments in understanding skilled performance, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 5, pp. 235-239, (2007)
4 Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, (2006)
5 Artistico, Daniele, Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults, Psychology and Aging, 18, 1, pp. 68-79, (2003)
6 Multivariate Analysemethoden, (2016)
7 Bandura, Albert, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977)
8 Complex Problem Solving the European Perspective, (1995)
9 Returning to Learning in an Age of Assessment Introducing the Rationale of the Collegiate Learning Assessment, (2009)
10 Elliot Bennett, Randy, Assessing complex problem solving performances, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10, 3, pp. 347-359, (2003)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
10
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers