Article 2017

Reducing Inmate Misconduct and Prison Returns with Facility Education Programs

Criminology and Public Policy
Journal · Vol. 16 · Issue 2 · pp. 515-547
Abstract

Research Summary: Participants and nonparticipants in Ohio prison education programs were compared in rates of misconduct during incarceration and prison returns after release. Propensity score matching was used to compare male nonparticipants with males who completed or started but did not complete GEDs, vocational training/apprenticeship programs, and college classes (each education group examined separately). More than 92,000 males were eligible for study, reflecting all men admitted to Ohio prisons between January 2008 and June 2012. Inmates who earned GEDs or completed college classes were less likely than nonprogram inmates to engage in violence during incarceration, whereas completing vocational training and apprenticeship programs had no such effect on any type of inmate misconduct examined. On the other hand, completing vocational training and apprenticeship programs, GEDs, or college classes at any point during incarceration coincided with lower rates of prison returns within 3 years after release. None of these benefits accrued to inmates who started but did not complete these programs/classes. Policy Implications: The provision of GED programs and college classes to prison inmates may help to reduce levels of violence during incarceration, thus, providing safer facility environments for both inmates and staff. GED programs, college classes, and vocational training/apprenticeship programs may also help offenders to refrain from returning to prison, perhaps by providing knowledge and skills that enhance their employability in desirable jobs after release. The absence of comparable findings for inmates who started but did not complete these activities, however, underscores the importance of completion, providing incentive for state policy makers and correctional administrators to encourage inmates to complete these pursuits. © 2017 American Society of Criminology

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 9 References
1 Andrews, Donald A., The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, (2010)
2 Andrews, Donald A., DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META‐ANALYSIS, Criminology, 28, 3, pp. 369-404, (1990)
3 Prison Police and Programs Evidence Based Options that Reduce Crime and Save Money, (2013)
4 Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, (2010)
5 Barth, Richard P., Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating the success of child and family service programs, Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 3, pp. 212-222, (2008)
6 Batiuk, Mary Ellen, Disentangling the effects of correctional education: Are current policies misguided? An event history analysis, Criminal Justice, 5, 1, pp. 55-74, (2005)
7 From the Classroom to the Community Exploring the Role of Education During Incarceration and Reentry, (2009)
8 Criminology Public Policy, (2007)
9 Prisoners in 2012 Trends in Admissions and Releases 1991 2012, (2013)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
91
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 9
Document Identifiers