Article 2025

Enhancing reflective thinking in STEM education through experiential learning: The role of generative AI as a learning aid

Education and Information Technologies
Journal · Vol. 30 · Issue 5 · pp. 6315-6337
Abstract

With the promotion of STEM education and active practice, experiential learning has become a crucial instructional design strategy. Experiential learning emphasizes a student-centered learning model, encouraging students to explore unknown fields through individual and team collaborative efforts. Through practical activities, it promotes active exploration and deep understanding, thereby stimulating students’ creativity and independent thinking abilities. However, there are still some challenges confronting the learners. However, due to the limitations of short-term memory and the ability to organize key information, students often struggle to recall all past dialogues during reflection and observation processes. This hinders effective discussions and communication, impacting the application of collaborative strategies. To address this challenge in STEM collaborative discussions, this study explores the application of generative AI technology in STEM education. By integrating experiential learning with collaborative strategies, the goal is to enhance students’ learning outcomes and reflective thinking. This research introduces a GPT-based large language model tool, the GPT-Assisted Summarization Aid (GASA), which is applied in collaborative learning activities within the framework of experiential learning. GASA supports learners in their reflective observation and conceptualization processes by providing feedback and assistance tailored to different phases of the experiential learning curriculum. The experimental results indicate significant differences in learning outcomes and reflective thinking between the experimental group using GASA and the control group. Furthermore, students in the experimental group were more effective in sharing information, establishing a common understanding, and solving problems during the collaborative learning process. This study provides empirical evidence for teaching strategies in STEM education and reveals the potential of generative AI technology in educational technology. Future research should explore larger sample sizes and long-term learning impacts to further validate the broad applicability of GASA in different educational contexts. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.

Keywords

Author Keywords

collaborative learning Generative AI Experiential learning STEM education Reflective thinking

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Graduate School of Technological and Vocational Education, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin, Taiwan
Department of Engineering Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
National Science and Technology Council, NSTC
Grant: 110-2511-H-006-012-MY3, 111-2628-H-224 -001-MY3, 110-2511-H-224-003-MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-006-008 -MY3, NSTC 112-2410-H-006 -053 -MY3
This research is supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. under grant Nos. NSTC 112-2410-H-006 -053 -MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-224-003-MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-006-012-MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-006-008 -MY3, and NSTC 111-2628-H-224 -001-MY3.
National Science and Technology Council, NSTC
This research is supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. under grant Nos. NSTC 112-2410-H-006 -053 -MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-224-003-MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-006-012-MY3, NSTC 110-2511-H-006-008 -MY3, and NSTC 111-2628-H-224 -001-MY3.
References 10 References
1 An, Shuowen, Effects of ability grouping on students’ collaborative problem solving patterns: Evidence from lag sequence analysis and epistemic network analysis, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, (2024)
2 Andrews-Todd, Jessica, Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task, Computers in Human Behavior, 104, (2020)
3 Observing Interaction an Introduction to Sequential Analysis, (1997)
4 Burch, Gerald F., A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Experiential Learning and Learning Outcomes, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 17, 3, pp. 239-273, (2019)
5 Chang, Chiajung, An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations, Computers and Education, 114, pp. 222-235, (2017)
6 Chen, Ching Huei, Effectiveness of AI-assisted game-based learning on science learning outcomes, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning behavior, Education and Information Technologies, 29, 14, pp. 18621-18642, (2024)
7 Chen, Yu, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Student Assistants in the Classroom: Designing Chatbots to Support Student Success, Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 1, pp. 161-182, (2023)
8 Cheng, Shuchen, From reflective observation to active learning: A mobile experiential learning approach for environmental science education, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 5, pp. 2251-2270, (2019)
9 Coulson, Debra, Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: A framework, Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 4, pp. 401-413, (2013)
10 How We Think, (1933)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
34
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers