Article 2016

Rice postharvest learning alliance in Cambodia: comparison of assumptions and implementation of a network approach

Journal of Development Effectiveness
Journal · Vol. 8 · Issue 4 · pp. 489-507
Abstract

Research projects employ the learning alliance (LA) approach but there is scepticism that its rhetoric is not evident in practice. The authors examined a case of an implemented LA, comparing its outcomes with assumptions from the project and its conceptual design to evaluate the implementation of an LA. Data were from interviews and network maps of actors involved, as well as farmers and town-level actors in Battambang and Pursat, Cambodia. An LA approach can promote actor–network processes that target social, technical, and institutional reordering. Assumptions about the approach, however, may lead projects to emphasize scaling out and direct efforts away from processes that enable innovation. © 2016 International Rice Research Institute.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Innovation Networks Learning Alliance action theories rice postharvest theories of change

Index Keywords

learning innovation institutional framework Cambodia actor network theory rice smallholder
Author Affiliations
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines
Funding & Acknowledgements
Asian Development Bank, ADB
Grant: ADB-RETA 7493
This work was supported by the Global Rice Science Partnership (GRiSP); Asian Development Bank; [ADB-RETA 7493]; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).
Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit, DEZA
This work was supported by the Global Rice Science Partnership (GRiSP); Asian Development Bank; [ADB-RETA 7493]; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).
References 10 References
1 Learning how to do Things Differently Challenges in Sharing Tacit Knowledge for Agricultural and Rural Development, (2005)
2 Shaping Technology Building Society Studies in Sociotechnical Change, (1992)
3 Theory in Practice, (1974)
4 Ashley, Richard Martin, Learning and Action Alliances to build capacity for flood resilience, Journal of Flood Risk Management, 5, 1, pp. 14-22, (2012)
5 Learning Alliance Briefing Note 9 Visioning, (2008)
6 Working Together Learning Together Learning Alliances in Agroenterprise Development, (2009)
7 Enabling Innovation A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change, (2002)
8 Participatory Impact Pathway and Project Planning Workshop Report, (2008)
9 Douthwaite, Boru, Participatory impact pathways analysis: A practical application of program theory in research-for-development, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 22, 2, pp. 127-159, (2007)
10 Douthwaite, Boru, Understanding how participatory approaches foster innovation, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7, 1, pp. 42-60, (2009)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers