Article 2016

Defining Conceptual Understanding for Teaching in International Business

Journal of Teaching in International Business
Journal · Vol. 27 · Issue 2-3 · pp. 106-123
Abstract

The aim of this exploratory study is to develop a definition of conceptual understanding for teaching in international business. In international business, professionals face complex problems like what to produce, where to manufacture, which markets to target, and when to expand abroad. A clear definition of conceptual understanding needed to solve such problems would provide design input for international business education. In three cycles, two independent expert panels with backgrounds in academic research, international business education, and international business practice identified and validated key components of conceptual understanding in international business. Key components are the global and local contexts, general and specific business practices, and theoretical business concepts and mechanisms. Other key characteristics include factual knowledge, explanation, and out-of-the-box thinking. © 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

Author Keywords

conceptual understanding higher professional education Out-of-the-box thinking Teaching in international business

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Education, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands, Department of Education, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Education, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, Radboud Graduate School of Teaching, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Aggarwal, Raj, Scholarship of teaching international business: Hallenges and opportunities, Journal of Teaching in International Business, 22, 1, pp. 1-12, (2011)
2 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Auditing quality of research in social sciences, Quality and Quantity, 42, 2, pp. 257-274, (2008)
3 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, The complexity of educational design research, Quality and Quantity, 47, 1, pp. 421-439, (2013)
4 Allen, Deborah E., Rubrics: Tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners, CBE Life Sciences Education, 5, 3, pp. 197-203, (2006)
5 Educational Psychology A Cognitive View, (1968)
6 Psychology of Written Composition, (1987)
7 Billett, Stephen Richard, Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise, Learning and Instruction, 11, 6, pp. 431-452, (2001)
8 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, (1956)
9 Chi, Michelene T.H., Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately?, Cognition and Instruction, 22, 3, pp. 363-387, (2004)
10 Knowing Learning and Instruction Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, (1989)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
12
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers