Conference paper 2016

Benefits of full-scale physical models in civil engineering education

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Conference · Vol. 2016-June
Abstract

Engineering students, usually, show a greater interest in topics which are demonstrated physically rather than those that are explained using the so called 'chalk and talk' methods, that is, by oral presentations and blackboard/whiteboard/OHP. Also, students are motivated by hands-on experience and by linking concepts and physical models to real engineering problems. A hands-on project has been designed by the Author for civil engineering students to improve their practical considerations in designing structures. The project is about Design, Assemble and Dismantle (DAD) of a full-scale lattice structure. A specific teaching kit including prefabricated full-scale tubular steel members, as well as required connectors has been designed and manufactured for the DAD Project and the participants should design a structure using (all or part of) the provided structural components. The project is modified to suite the participants at different levels, i.e. postgraduate or undergraduate levels. Also, a simpler version has been offered as a part of the 'University Promotional Programmes' for secondary school students. This paper provides further information about the background of the DAD Project and discusses the Project in more detail. Also, relevant literature is reviewed and a methodology is proposed to assess the potential benefits of using full-scale physical models as a part of a master degree module offered in the academic year 2015-16. Finally, the outcomes of the research, as well as further recommendations are provided. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
National Science Foundation, NSF
Grant: 0741714, 76156-10488, DRK-12 DRL: 1417769, EEC-1132482
This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants DRK-12 DRL: 1417769, GK-12 Fellows DGE: 0741714, and RET Site EEC-1132482, and NY Space Grant Consortium grant 76156-10488. Moreover, it is supported in part by the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (funded by the Black Male Donor Collaborative, Brooklyn Community Foundation, J.P. Morgan Chase Foundation, Motorola Innovation Generation Grant, NY Space Grant Consortium, Xerox Foundation, and White Cedar Fund), Fred and Joanne Wilson, and Siegel Family Endowment. The authors thank the four teachers for their participation in this study.
Xerox Foundation
This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants DRK-12 DRL: 1417769, GK-12 Fellows DGE: 0741714, and RET Site EEC-1132482, and NY Space Grant Consortium grant 76156-10488. Moreover, it is supported in part by the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (funded by the Black Male Donor Collaborative, Brooklyn Community Foundation, J.P. Morgan Chase Foundation, Motorola Innovation Generation Grant, NY Space Grant Consortium, Xerox Foundation, and White Cedar Fund), Fred and Joanne Wilson, and Siegel Family Endowment. The authors thank the four teachers for their participation in this study.
References 10 References
1 undefined
2 Gillie, Martin, Creative conceptual design teaching: It's not about rebar curtailment!, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 140, 3, (2014)
3 Basic Structural Behaviour Understanding Structures from Models, (1993)
4 Ji, Tianjian, Seeing and touching structural concepts, Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts, pp. 1-269, (2018)
5 Architectus, (2014)
6 undefined
7 Hassan, Osama A.B., Learning theories and assessment methodologies - an engineering educational perspective, European Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 4, pp. 327-339, (2011)
8 Froyd, Jeffrey E., Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education, Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, SPL CONTENT, pp. 1344-1360, (2012)
9 Chan, Paul W., The dominance of practice in constructionarium: Exploring the challenges of linking theory and practice, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2009 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference, pp. 457-466, (2009)
10 Conference Proceedings of What is the Future of Construction, (1993)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-84983268943
  • Language English