Article 2015

A science, technology, engineering and mathematics course with computer-assisted remedial learning system support for vocational high school students

Journal of Baltic Science Education
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 5 · pp. 641-654
Abstract

One of the significant and distinguishing curriculum characteristics of STEM compared to other subjects domains is hands-on skill development. Hands-on training enables the enhancement of learning because it parallels with the concrete-to-abstract nature of cognitive development, providing additional sources of brain activation via kinaesthetic involvement and elevating students’ motivation and engagement. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, and advance unprepared students’ hands-on skills, this research proposed and implemented an innovative STEM course with the computer-assisted remedial learning system (CARLS) in the vocational high school experience in Taiwan. The effects of STEM course were examined through an experiment with learning performances hypotheses. A total of 32 students in a vocational high school in Taiwan voluntarily participated in this research and a one-group pre-test and post-test pre-experimental design was adopted. The results of this experimental course demonstrated that CARLS is effective and contributed in enhancing students’ knowledge, achievement and hands-on skill performance in this STEM course. Suggestions and implications for STEM education is also made for practitioners and educators. © 2015. Scientific Methodical Center ”Scientia Educologica“, Lithuania.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational High School STEM Computer-Assisted Remedial Learning System Hands-on activities

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Changhua, Taiwan
National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Changhua, Taiwan
National Taichung University of Education, Taichung, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Anakwe, Bridget, Comparison of Student Performance in Paper-Based Versus Computer-Based Testing, Journal of Education for Business, 84, 1, pp. 13-17, (2008)
2 Appleby, John, Diagnosys - A knowledge-based diagnostic test of basic mathematical skills, Computers and Education, 28, 2, pp. 113-131, (1997)
3 Design and Technology Education an International Journal, (2007)
4 Philosophical and Psychological Basis of General Science Education, (2011)
5 Broks, Andris, Scientific thinking: The backbone of modern science and technology education, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13, 6, pp. 764-766, (2014)
6 Brown, John Seely, Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills, Cognitive Science, 2, 2, pp. 155-192, (1978)
7 Bugbee, Alan C., The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 3, pp. 282-299, (1996)
8 Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Research, (1963)
9 Case, Robbie, Schooling and the development of central conceptual structures: An example from the domain of children's narrative, International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 8, pp. 835-855, (1989)
10 Chang, Kuo En, A testing system for diagnosing misconceptions in DC electric circuits, Computers and Education, 31, 2, pp. 195-210, (1998)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
13
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-84947228963
  • Language English