Article 2025

The stability and acceptance of the “system of competency-based curriculum design” framework: Perspectives of teachers

Curriculum Journal
Journal · Vol. 36 · Issue 1 · pp. 91-109
Abstract

The “System of Competency-Based Curriculum Design” (SCCD) framework was developed to meet the requirement for reform in competency-based education and overcome the limitations of Understanding by Design (UbD). This comprehensive framework, incorporating knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values, aligns with competency ingredients as defined by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and integrates diverse curriculum theories. It provides educators with clear steps and empowers them to make iterative calibration while designing units/courses, ensuring a dynamic and responsive approach to curriculum development. To assess the stability and acceptance of the SCCD framework, a research instrument was developed, encompassing five stability subscales with a total of 25 items and an additional acceptance subscale featuring five items. A total of 455 participants who participated in SCCD training workshops were involved in the study. The research outcomes affirm the robustness of its theoretical foundation. Additionally, the unequivocal endorsement of its concept by teachers from diverse backgrounds serves as further validation of its integrity. The study concludes with recommendations derived from the obtained results. © 2024 British Educational Research Association.

Keywords

Author Keywords

competency-based education (CBE) stability and acceptance system of competence-based curriculum design (SCCD) system stability understanding by design (UbD)

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Center of Teacher Education, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Center for Teacher Education, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
General Education Center, National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
Ministry of Education, MOE
Grant: 1100077195
This research is part of the commissioned project by the Ministry of Education (Project Number: Taiwan Teacher (III) Letter No. 1100077195). We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude here.
References 10 References
1 Journal of Competency Based Education, (2018)
2 Vermeulen, Freek, Quick thinking, Business Strategy Review, 19, 2, pp. 54-59, (2008)
3 Burnette, Diane M., The Renewal of Competency-Based Education: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64, 2, pp. 84-93, (2016)
4 Comparative Education, (2022)
5 Effects of the Instruction of an Sscd Unit Plan on Fifth Grade Students Learning Outcomes A Case Study, (2023)
6 Taboo, (2005)
7 Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, (2017)
8 Revisiting Professional Learning Communities at Work New Insights for Improving Schools, (2008)
9 Assessment as Learning Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning, (2003)
10 Journal of Competency Based Education, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers