Article Green Open Access 2015

Addressing Multilevel Program Complexity by Evaluation Design

European Policy Analysis
Journal · Vol. 1 · Issue 2 · pp. 90-110
Abstract

In this paper, we present the evaluation design for a complex multilevel program recently introduced in Switzerland. The evaluation embraces the federal level, the cantonal program level, and the project level where target groups are directly addressed. We employ Pawson and Tilley's realist evaluation approach, in order to do justice to the varying context factors that impact the cantonal programs leading to varying effectiveness of the implemented activities. The application of the model to the canton of Uri shows that the numerous vertical and horizontal relations play a crucial role for the program's effectiveness. As a general learning for the evaluation of complex programs, we state that there is a need to consider all affected levels of a program and that no monocausal effects can be singled out in programs where multiple interventions address the same problem. Moreover, considering all affected levels of a program can mean going beyond the borders of the actual program organization and including factors that do not directly interfere with the policy delivery as such. In particular, we found that the relationship between the cantonal and the federal level was a crucial organizational factor influencing the effectiveness of the cantonal program. © 2015 Policy Studies Organization

Keywords

Author Keywords

complexity realist evaluation evaluation design implementation analysis multi-level governance tobacco prevention program

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, BE, Switzerland
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Bała, Małgorzata Maria, Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013, 6, (2013)
2 Balthasar, Andreas, Die Verbreitung evidenzbasierter und gleichstellungssensitiver Informationen in den Entscheidungsprozessen kantonaler Steuer- und Sozialtransferpolitik: eine quantitative Analyse, Swiss Political Science Review, 20, 1, pp. 70-95, (2014)
3 Befani, Barbara, Realistic Evaluation and QCA: Conceptual Parallels and an Empirical Application, Evaluation, 13, 2, pp. 171-192, (2007)
4 Blatter, Joachim K., Enhancing gender equity through evidence-based policymaking? Theorizing and tracing the use of systematic knowledge in family and tax policy reforms, European Policy Analysis, 1, 1, pp. 3-34, (2015)
5 Handbook of Public Administration, (2003)
6 Howlett, Michael P., Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada, Canadian Public Administration, 52, 2, pp. 153-175, (2009)
7 Policy and Society, (2007)
8 Die Politischen Systeme Osteuropas, (2010)
9 Handbook of Swiss Politics, (2007)
10 Einfuhrung in Die Politikevaluation, (1997)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
10
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers