Article 2015

Convergent evolution of health information management and health informatics: A perspective on the future of information professionals in health care

Applied Clinical Informatics
Journal · Vol. 6 · Issue 1 · pp. 163-184
Abstract

Clearly defined boundaries are disappearing among the activities, sources, and uses of health care data and information managed by health information management (HIM) and health informatics (HI) professionals. Definitions of the professional domains and scopes of practice for HIM and HI are converging with the proliferation of information and communication technologies in health care settaings. Convergence is changing both the roles that HIM and HI professionals serve in their organizations as well as the competencies necessary for training future professionals. Many of these changes suggest a blurring of roles and responsibilities with increasingly overlapping curricula, job descriptions, and research agendas. Blurred lines in a highly competitive market create confusion for students and employers. In this essay, we provide some perspective on the changing landscape and suggest a course for the future. First we review the evolving definitions of HIM and HI. We next compare the current domains and competencies, review the characteristics as well as the education and credentialing of both disciplines, and examine areas of convergence. Given the current state, we suggest a path forward to strengthen the contributions HIM and HI professionals and educators make to the evolving health care environment. © Schattauer 2015.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Competency-based education Information Management informatics

Index Keywords

Vocational education education health care personnel Health Personnel medical information system Health Information Management Education, Professional Accreditation health care delivery Delivery of Health Care medical informatics
Author Affiliations
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada
Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, IN, United States, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Medical Center, North Chicago, United States
Canadian Health Information Management Association, London, ON, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 DesRoches, Catherine M., Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012, Health Affairs, 32, 8, pp. 1478-1485, (2013)
2 Furukawa, Michael F., Hospital electronic health information exchange grew substantially in 2008-12, Health Affairs, 32, 8, pp. 1346-1354, (2013)
3 Patel, Vaishali N., Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28, 7, pp. 957-964, (2013)
4 Emerging Benefits of Electronic Medical Record Use in Community Based Care, (2013)
5 Meaningful Use
6 Furukawa, Michael F., Meaningful use of health information technology: Evidence suggests benefits and challenges lie ahead, American Journal of Managed Care, 17, SPEC. ISSUE, (2011)
7 Progress in Canada
8 Whipple, Elizabeth C., Linking health information technology to patient safety and quality outcomes: A bibliometric analysis and review, Informatics for Health and Social Care, 38, 1, pp. 1-14, (2013)
9 Blaya, Joaquín A., E-health technologies show promise in developing countries, Health Affairs, 29, 2, pp. 244-251, (2010)
10 Bates, David D.B., Improving safety with information technology, New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 25, pp. 2526-2534, (2003)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
40
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers