Article 2015

An evaluation of plastic surgery resident selection factors

Journal of Surgical Education
Journal · Vol. 72 · Issue 1 · pp. 8-15
Abstract

Objective Our purpose was to provide a metric by which evaluation criteria are prioritized during resident selection. In this study, we assessed which residency applicant qualities are deemed important by members of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons (AAPS). Methods A survey was distributed to all 580 AAPS members, and 295 responded to rate the importance of resident metrics, including measures of competency and personal characteristics. Demographic information, background training, and interaction with residents were also noted. Using SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), outcomes were analyzed across demographic groups with column trend exact (CTE) test for ordinal variables, Mantel-Haenszel trend test for interval variables, and Fisher exact test for discrete variables. Results Regarding competency metrics, letters of recommendation from known sources is the most important factor, whereas letters from unknown sources ranks the lowest. Character evaluations identified honesty as the most desirable trait; dishonesty was the most despised. Across demographic groups, academic surgeons and program directors value letters from known sources more than nonacademicians or nonprogram directors (CTE p = 0.005 and 0.002, respectively). Academicians and current program directors regard research more highly than their counterparts do (CTE p = 0.022 and 0.022, respectively). Currently, practicing surgeons, academicians, and program directors value hard work more than others (CTE p = 0.008, 0.033, and 0.029, respectively). Program directors emphasize maturity and patient commitment and are less tolerant of narcissism (CTE p = 0.002, 0.005, and 0.003, respectively). Lastly, academic surgeons and program directors look more favorably upon strong team players (CTE p < 0.00001 and p = 0.008, respectively), but less so over time (Mantel-Haenszel trend p = 0.006). Conclusions We have examined applicant metrics that were deemed important by AAPS members and assessed their demographic interpretation. We hope this article provides a framework for plastic surgery resident selection and a guide for applicants to ascertain which qualities are highly regarded by programs. Although these attributes are highly desirable, future studies could identify if they are predictive of successful and productive plastic surgery residencies and careers. © 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery.

Keywords

Author Keywords

surgical education plastic surgery residency application

Index Keywords

adult clinical competence human medical education psychology Humans Internship and Residency Article interpersonal communication curriculum education Personnel selection medical student residency education Students, Medical health personnel attitude Attitude of Health Personnel resident Educational Measurement personnel management personality communication medical society evaluation study priority journal plastic surgery Surgery, Plastic
Author Affiliations
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Biostatistical Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Department of Plastic Surgery, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Results and Data 2011 Main Residency Match, (2011)
2 Curry, Raymond H., A path analysis of medical school and residency performance: Implications for Housestaff Selection, Evaluation & the Health Professions, 11, 1, pp. 113-129, (1988)
3 Crane, Joseph T., Selection criteria for emergency medicine residency applicants, Academic Emergency Medicine, 7, 1, pp. 54-60, (2000)
4 Bell, Jeffrey G., Selection of obstetrics and gynecology residents on the basis of medical school performance., American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 186, 5, pp. 1091-1094, (2002)
5 Guo, Lifei, Comparison of quantitative educational metrics between integrated and independent plastic surgery residents, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 122, 3, pp. 972-978, (2008)
6 Brothers, Thomas Edward, Importance of the Faculty Interview During the Resident Application Process, Journal of Surgical Education, 64, 6, pp. 378-385, (2007)
7 Borowitz, Stephen Mark, Information collected during the residency match process does not predict clinical performance, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 3, pp. 256-260, (2000)
8 Turner, Norman S., A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 449, pp. 50-55, (2006)
9 Dirschl, Douglas R., Correlating selection criteria with subsequent performance as residents, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 399, pp. 265-271, (2002)
10 Calhoun, Karen Hall, Predictors of residency performance: A follow-up study, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 116, 6, pp. 647-651, (1997)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
44
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers