Article 2014

Prison sourcing:'Doing good' or 'good for business'?

Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases
Journal · Vol. 4 · Issue 1 · pp. 99-106
Abstract

This teaching case explores the business and ethics of prison sourcing, the practice of training and hiring prisoners to perform work for the private or public sectors. Although most prison employment programs train and hire workers for manual labor, such as furniture building or textiles, some prison employment programs now train and hire inmates to perform low-level Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) services like call center work, data entry, and document preparation. Prison sourcing is highly controversial. Besides the usual concerns about security and quality of work performed by prisoners, the ethical aspects of prison sourcing are hotly debated. Proponents argue prison sourcing is ethical because it defrays the costs of corrections, helps individuals successfully complete their confinement and prepares them to reintegrate into society, benefitting the individuals, their families, communities, and ultimately tax payers. Opponents argue that prison sourcing is a form of slavery, hurts small businesses, and steals jobs from law-abiding citizens. The authors developed this teaching case to allow students to explore these issues. The case is a dramatized version of an actual case study of prisoners performing BPO work for a private sector company. © 2014 JITTC Palgrave Macmillan.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Business process outsourcing Deontological ethics Ethical sourcing Impact sourcing Prison sourcing Teleological ethics

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
College of Business, College of Business Administration, St. Louis, MO, United States
Kogod School of Business, Washington, D.C., United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Evidence Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Future Prison Construction Criminal Justice Costs and Crime Rates, (2006)
2 undefined, (2010)
3 Business Credit, (2010)
4 Government Executive, (2005)
5 Cornell University Ilr School, (2007)
6 Lacity, Mary C., Impact sourcing: Employing prison inmates to perform digitally-enabled business services, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 1, pp. 913-932, (2014)
7 Lipsey, Mark W., The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, pp. 297-320, (2007)
8 Uspto and Google to Make Patent Trademark Data Public, (2010)
9 Proceedings of the American Society of Criminology, (2008)
10 Richmond, Kerry M., The Impact of Federal Prison Industries Employment on the Recidivism Outcomes of Female Inmates, Justice Quarterly, 31, 4, pp. 719-745, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers