Article Gold Open Access 2014

Does CVT of firms in Germany suffer from poaching?

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 6 · Issue 1 · Art. 1
Abstract

'Non-excludability' of skills is suspected to give rise to poaching externalities and cause under-investment in training. To substantiate this hypothesis, the paper at hand investigates the relationship between labor turnover and firms' dedication to continuing vocational training (CVT) exploiting novel survey data on firms in Germany (BIBB-FluCT data, N = 1.238). Regression analyses of these data point at a negative correlation between turnover and CVT incidence in firms with presumably low skill needs (i.e. firms employing workers with no formal vocational education). However, the scope of the relationship is of limited economic relevance. Merely a minority of firms states to actually forego CVT because of high turnover. Also, the direction of the relationship remains debatable; a reversed negative effect of training on turnover seems unlikely, but not impossible. Eventually, when exclusively focusing on firms providing some CVT (80.6% of the sampled firms), no negative and significant relationship between turnover and CVT spending emerges in the analyses; this is regardless of whether training is rather specific, or rather general. Overall, these findings do not serve to reinforce the notion of a generally detrimental effect of turnover on CVT. Note however, that a poaching problem may not necessarily become manifest in the relationship between turnover and training. For instance, employers explicitly stating to pay attention to potential training externalities provide CVT with a slightly lower probability than other employers. They might fear a free-rider problem regardless of the actual dimension of turnover. Notwithstanding, even this effect is limited in scope suggesting that only few firms actually withdraw from CVT because of a perceived free-rider problem. Altogether, the evidence available to substantiate the hypothesis of prevalent under-investment in CVT is not very compelling. In fact, payback clauses may help employers turn 'non-excludable' skills into part-time private goods and mitigate potential poaching risks. The analyses indicate that payback clauses go along with considerably higher employer-spending on CVT. © 2014 Mueller; licensee Springer.

Keywords

Author Keywords

human capital Employer-provided training Continuing vocational training Labor turnover Market imperfections Poaching externalities Private-sector training Training finance

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training, Bonn, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Acemoglu, Daron, Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market, Review of Economic Studies, 64, 3, pp. 445-464, (1997)
2 Acemoglu, Daron, Beyond becker: Training in imperfect labour markets, Economic Journal, 109, 453, pp. 112-142, (1999)
3 Acemoglu, Daron, The structure of wages and investment in general training, Journal of Political Economy, 107, 3, pp. 539-572, (1999)
4 Zeitschrift Fur Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, (1998)
5 Journal of Political Economy, (1962)
6 Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft Und Praxis, (2012)
7 Brunello, Giorgio, Training and economic density: Some evidence form Italian provinces, Labour Economics, 15, 1, pp. 118-140, (2008)
8 Brunello, Giorgio, Is there under-provision of training?, Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1, 1, pp. 1-18, (2009)
9 Agglomeration Effects on Employer Provided Training Evidence for the Uk, (2004)
10 De Grip, Andries, The Effects of Training on Own and Co-worker Productivity: Evidence from a Field Experiment, Economic Journal, 122, 560, pp. 376-399, (2012)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers