Article 2013

Ethnicity Effects in Graduates' Résumé Content

Applied Psychology
Journal · Vol. 62 · Issue 3 · pp. 427-453
Abstract

Highly educated ethnic minority entrants in Western countries need more time to find a job compared to their Western ethnic majority counterparts. The present study examined whether this differential job access is partly explained by the way ethnic minorities present themselves in their résumés. To this end, a comparison between 100 non-Western ethnic minority graduate résumés and 100 native Western ethnic majority graduate résumés was made. Non-Western ethnic minorities score significantly lower on reported organisational internships, leadership experiences, and extracurricular activities. Although most effects were small, these differences in résumé content resulted in lower job suitability ratings for non-Western ethnic minorities compared to Western ethnic majorities, as judged by professional recruiters/HR experts. Résumé presentation (e.g. layout and grammar) also was a significant predictor of job suitability ratings, but no ethnicity effects were found in these résumé characteristics. Because rater effects which may be related to hiring discrimination were controlled for, it can be concluded that the reported human capital in résumés can explain differential job access of ethnic minority compared to ethnic majority graduates. Theoretical and practical implications for assessing ethnic minorities upon organisational entry are discussed. © 2012 The Authors. © 2012 International Association of Applied Psychology.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Universiteit Gent, Ghent, VOV, Belgium
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Arnulf, Jan Ketil Etil, Impression making by résumé layout: Its impact on the probability of being shortlisted, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 2, pp. 221-230, (2010)
2 Augoustinos, Martha, Stereotypes and prejudice: The Australian experience, British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1, pp. 125-141, (1994)
3 undefined, (2011)
4 American Economic Review, (2004)
5 Bills, David B., EMPLOYERS’ USE OF JOB HISTORY DATA FOR MAKING HIRING DECISIONS: A Fuller Specification of Job Assignment and Status Attainment, Sociological Quarterly, 31, 1, pp. 23-35, (1990)
6 Blanton, Hart, Strong Claims and Weak Evidence: Reassessing the Predictive Validity of the IAT, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 3, pp. 567-582, (2009)
7 Born, Marise Ph., Assessing people for work-related purposes: Diversity, morality and subjectivity, Gedrag en Organisatie, 23, 3, pp. 232-256, (2010)
8 Brief, Arthur Paul, Just Doing Business: Modern Racism and Obedience to Authority as Explanations for Employment Discrimination, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 1, pp. 72-97, (2000)
9 Brown, Barbara K., Biodata Phenomenology: Recruiters' Perceptions and Use of Biographical Information in Resume Screening, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 6, pp. 897-908, (1994)
10 Cable, Daniel M., Looked over or overlooked? Prescreening decisions and postinterview evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3, pp. 501-508, (1998)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
15
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers