Article 2011

The interaction of drill and practice and error training with individual differences

Cognition, Technology and Work
Journal · Vol. 13 · Issue 2 · pp. 103-120
Abstract

This article examines the question of whether the effectiveness of training methods in vocational training settings is modified by trainee characteristics. General mental abilities, cognitive style and conscientiousness were measured as person variables that were expected to influence the effectiveness of training methods. Being trained on a simulated process control environment as an example for a complex technological task for 5 h, N = 38 participants received either drill and practice (D and P) or error training (ET) as two distinct training methods. A 70-minute transfer test followed 9 weeks later, in which the trainees had to manage familiar (near transfer) as well as unfamiliar fault states (far transfer). The results showed that high-ability trainees benefited more from DandP than from ET, whereas low-ability trainees benefited equally well from either training method. Furthermore, participants with a highly flexible cognitive style benefited more from DandP rather than ET. Also participants low in conscientiousness profited more from DandP. The findings are indicative of the tentative benefits of using learner-tailored training methods, suggesting that this person-centered approach is worthy of further exploration. © 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Training vocational education and training individual differences Drill and practice Error training Process control

Index Keywords

Personnel training training Vocational training Vocational education and training Cognitive styles Process control Training methods Individual Differences Control environment Person-centered approach Simulated process Drills
Author Affiliations
Business and Organizational Psychology, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Research Institute for Organizational Psychology, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, SG, Switzerland
Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, FR, Switzerland
Funding & Acknowledgements
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, SNF
Grant: P001—106354, 106354
This project has been funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (No. P001\u2014106354).
References 10 References
1 Anderson, John Robert, The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 4, pp. 932-945, (1997)
2 Barrick, Murray R., THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS, Personnel Psychology, 44, 1, pp. 1-26, (1991)
3 Industrial Relations Journal, (2008)
4 Human Factors Issues in Complex System Performance, (2007)
5 Burkolter, Dina, The predictive qualities of operator characteristics for process control performance: The influence of personality and cognitive variables, Ergonomics, 52, 3, pp. 302-311, (2009)
6 Military Psychology, (1995)
7 Cassidy, Simon, Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures, Educational Psychology, 24, 4, pp. 419-444, (2004)
8 Chen, Gilad, Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 6, pp. 835-847, (2000)
9 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (1988)
10 Colquitt, Jason A., Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 5, pp. 678-707, (2000)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
12
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers