Book chapter Gold Open Access 2025

Developing Curriculum for Deep Thinking The Knowledge Revival

Springer Briefs in Education
Journal · Vol. Part F4047 · pp. 1-91
Abstract

This open access book discusses why the seemingly straightforward strategy of teaching children how to think deeply does not work and offers an alternative way forward for the curriculum to achieve these objectives. Over the years, the role of knowledge in the curriculum has, like a pendulum, shifted between two extremes, from highly visible to virtually invisible knowledge elements. Insights from cognitive and educational psychology, sociology, and curriculum studies are used to underpin the current knowledge revival that is widely being observed in education. A knowledge-rich curriculum is proposed by the authors as not only the soundest way forward to both effectively acquire knowledge and complex cognitive skills in school, but also as a crucial lever to achieve equitable opportunities for all students. In understanding how a knowledge-rich curriculum can enhance learning, three overarching principles are discussed: (1) content-richness, (2) coherence, and (3) clarity. These principles are illustrated through practical examples from schools and educators who have effectively integrated knowledge-rich curricula. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2025. This book is an open access publication.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Building knowledge rich curriculum Cognitive psychology in curriculum design Cognitive psychology in knowledge-rich curricula Curriculum building with case studies Effective curriculum design for deep learning Enhancing critical thinking through knowledge Enhancing problem solving through knowledge Global trends in educational curricula Implementing knowledge-rich curricula Knowledge in curricula Knowledge rich curriculum Knowledge-rich curriculum development Open Access Powerful knowledge theory in education Sociological perspectives on knowledge in curriculum

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Thomas More, Belgium, Mechelen, VAN, Belgium
Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
University of Auckland, Auckland, AUK, New Zealand
UCL Institute of Education, London, United Kingdom
Thomas More, Belgium, Mechelen, VAN, Belgium, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Barrett, Brian D., Rob Moore, social realism, and the sociology of education and knowledge, Research Handbook on Curriculum and Education, pp. 78-88, (2024)
2 Why Knowledge Matters Rescuing Our Children from Failed Educational Theories, (2016)
3 Hughson, Taylor Alexander, The OECD Learning Compass 2030 and the future of disciplinary learning: a Bernsteinian critique, Journal of Education Policy, 37, 4, pp. 634-654, (2022)
4 Future of Education and Labor, (2019)
5 Pisa 2022 Results Volume I the State of Learning and Equity in Education, (2023)
6 A C Black, (2013)
7 Creating Curricula Aims Knowledge and Control, (2014)
8 Rata, Elizabeth, The politics of knowledge in education, British Educational Research Journal, 38, 1, pp. 103-124, (2012)
9 Rata, Elizabeth, Introduction: Social realism, didaktik, and cognitive science in curriculum and education, Research Handbook on Curriculum and Education, pp. 1-18, (2024)
10 Routledge, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
7
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers