Article 2009

Developer, teacher, student and employer evaluations of competence-based assessment quality

Studies in Educational Evaluation
Journal · Vol. 35 · Issue 2-3 · pp. 110-119
Abstract

This study examines how different stakeholders experience the quality of a nationally developed assessment framework for summative, competence-based assessment (CBA) in AVET, which aims to reflect theoretical characteristics of high quality CBAs. The quality of two summative CBAs, based on this national framework, is evaluated along an extensive, validated set of quality criteria for CBA evaluation and through involving key stakeholders (i.e., students, teachers, developers, and employers). By triangulating quantitative and qualitative evaluations and argumentations of key stakeholders, this study gives insight into the processes and characteristics that determine CBA quality in VET educational practice in relation to theoretical notions of high quality CBAs. Results support many theoretical characteristics and refine them for reaching quality in actual assessment practice. Strikingly, developers and teachers are more critical about the assessment quality than students and employers. The discussion reflects on the theoretical CBA characteristics in the light of the empirical findings and deduces practical implications for the national assessment framework as well as other summative CBAs in VET. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Perceptions vocational education and training stakeholders competence-based assessment student evaluation Assessment quality

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Baartman, Liesbeth K.J., The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 2, pp. 153-170, (2006)
2 Baartman, Liesbeth K.J., Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks, Educational Research Review, 2, 2, pp. 114-129, (2007)
3 Baartman, Liesbeth K.J., Teachers' opinions on quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programs, Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 6, pp. 857-867, (2007)
4 Presidential Address Held at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, (2007)
5 Benett, Yves, The Validity and Reliability of Assessments and Self-assessments of Work-based Learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 2, pp. 83-94, (1993)
6 Biemans, Harm J.A., Competence-based vet in the netherlands: Background and pitfalls, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 4, pp. 523-538, (2004)
7 Birenbaum, Menucha, EVALUATING THE ASSESSMENT: SOURCES OF EVIDENCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 1, pp. 29-49, (2007)
8 Birenbaum, Menucha, A learning Integrated Assessment System, Educational Research Review, 1, 1, pp. 61-67, (2006)
9 Assessment in Education, (1998)
10 Assessment in Education, (1999)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
32
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers