Review 2007

Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31

Medical Teacher
Journal · Vol. 29 · Issue 9-10 · pp. 855-871
Abstract

Background: There has been concern that trainees are seldom observed, assessed, and given feedback during their workplace-based education. This has led to an increasing interest in a variety of formative assessment methods that require observation and offer the opportunity for feedback. Aims: To review some of the literature on the efficacy and prevalence of formative feedback, describe the common formative assessment methods, characterize the nature of feedback, examine the effect of faculty development on its quality, and summarize the challenges still faced. Results: The research literature on formative assessment and feedback suggests that it is a powerful means for changing the behaviour of trainees. Several methods for assessing it have been developed and there is preliminary evidence of their reliability and validity. A variety of factors enhance the efficacy of workplace-based assessment including the provision of feedback that is consistent with the needs of the learner and focused on important aspects of the performance. Faculty plays a critical role and successful implementation requires that they receive training. Conclusions: There is a need for formative assessment which offers trainees the opportunity for feedback. Several good methods exist and feedback has been shown to have a major influence on learning. The critical role of faculty is highlighted, as is the need for strategies to enhance their participation and training.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Teaching clinical competence human medical education Humans Internship and Residency learning environment workplace Quality control curriculum postgraduate education review Students, Medical clinical practice medical school anamnesis Educational Measurement Faculty competency-based education peer review Staff Development student attitude Clinical Clerkship Psychology, Educational patient assessment faculty practice Feedback, Psychological faculty student relation
Author Affiliations
Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, PA, United States
University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Arnold, Louise M., Use of peer evaluation in the assessment of medical students, Journal of Medical Education, 56, 1, pp. 35-42, (1981)
2 Archer, Julian C., Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training, British Medical Journal, 330, 7502, pp. 1251-1253, (2005)
3 Medical School Graduation Questionnaire
4 Balzer, William K., Effects of Cognitive Feedback on Performance, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 3, pp. 410-433, (1989)
5 Bargh, John A., The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 6, pp. 1014-1027, (2001)
6 Beck, Rainer S., Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review, Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 15, 1, pp. 25-38, (2002)
7 Anderson, Gavin G., Assessing the comparability of standardized patient and physician evaluations of clinical skills, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7, 2, pp. 85-97, (2002)
8 Branch, William T., Feedback and Reflection: Teaching Methods for Clinical Settings, Academic Medicine, 77, 12, pp. 1185-1188, (2002)
9 Burch, Vanessa Celeste, Formative assessment promotes learning in undergraduate clinical clerkships, South African Medical Journal, 96, 5, pp. 430-433, (2006)
10 Butler, Deborah L., Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, 3, pp. 245-281, (1995)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
677
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers