Article 2025

Creating thresholds for success and ‘underachievement’: a critical policy history of public examinations in England

Journal of Education Policy
Journal · Vol. 40 · Issue 4 · pp. 606-628
Abstract

In England, thresholds for success in public examinations taken by 15/16 year-olds play a major role in the education system. Definitions of what constitutes ‘success’ change over time and have an important impact on young people’s progression to further education, training, and employment. By taking a historical view of examination thresholds at 15/16 in England, we show that thresholds are not a mere reflection of societal or economic norms, nor are changes to them simply gradual adjustments or technical modifications. Using ideas from ‘critical policy sociology’ (see Savage, Gerard, Gale and Molla, 2021), we argue that thresholds can be understood as ‘temporary settlements’ (Gale 1999, p. 401) that are the product of four separate but interlocking policy contests around educational purposes, the importance of specific subjects, the role of education in the economy, and educational governance. Analysing and decoding the production of changing thresholds over long periods through these policy contests allows us to more clearly understand the contemporary situation (where thresholds have become very prescriptive) and to challenge the foundations of thresholds: creating space for different conceptions of success and failure. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

critical policy history educational failure Educational thresholds policy settlements progression standards

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Education, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, Newcastle University, Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
UCL Institute of Education, London, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
Nuffield Foundation
The work was supported by the\u00A0Nuffield Foundation. We are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We also wish to thank Suzie Clement for her assistance with the design of the figures in this paper. This work was supported by the Nuffield Foundation, an independent charitable trust with a mission to advance social well-being. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily the Foundation.
References 10 References
1 Anders, Jake, What young English people do once they reach school-leaving age: A cross-cohort comparison for the last 30 years, Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 8, 1, pp. 75-103, (2017)
2 Bacchi, Carol Lee, Introducing the ‘what's the problem represented to be?’ approach, Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges, pp. 21-24, (2012)
3 Examination Reform Impact of Linear and Modular Examinations at Gcse, (2019)
4 Parity and Prestige in English Secondary Education, (1955)
5 Barrance, Rhian, Young people’s views on choice and fairness through their experiences of curriculum as examination specifications at GCSE, Oxford Review of Education, 44, 1, pp. 19-36, (2018)
6 Comparable Outcomes Scourge or Scapegoat, (2016)
7 Biesta, Gert J.J., Reclaiming a future that has not yet been: The Faure report, UNESCO’s humanism and the need for the emancipation of education, International Review of Education, 68, 5, pp. 655-672, (2022)
8 Education Historical Statistics, (2012)
9 Assessment Schools and Society, (1979)
10 Contemporary Debates in Education an Historical Perspective, (1991)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers