Article 2004

HRD and the challenges of assessing learning in the workplace

International Journal of Training and Development
Journal · Vol. 8 · Issue 2 · pp. 140-156
Abstract

Increasingly the different ways in which learning can be conceptualised alongside debates within the field of human resource development (HRD) regarding its nature and purpose, potentially lead to confusion regarding how learning is to be assessed in the workplace. This article identifies some of the complexities associated with assessing learning in today's workplace and presents empirical findings suggesting that different aspects of an organisation's training and development system are likely to differentially determine the extent to which either formal or informal learning is assessed. Explanations as to why this may be the case are put forward. © 2004, John Wiley and Sons Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Not provided
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Sloan Management Review, (1993)
2 Personal Psychology, (1998)
3 Barrie, John A., Learning for organizational effectiveness: Philosophy of education and human resource development, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 1, pp. 39-54, (1998)
4 Bassi, Laurie J., The top ten trends, T and D, 50, 11, pp. 28-x1, (1996)
5 Understanding Learning at Work, (1999)
6 Bramley, Peter, Evaluating effective management learning, Journal of European Industrial Training, 23, 3, pp. 145-153, (1999)
7 Training and Development Journal, (1982)
8 Brookfield, Stephen D., Uncovering Assumptions: The Key to Reflective Practice, Adult Learning, 3, 4, pp. 13-18, (1992)
9 Bryans, Patricia, Beyond training: reconceptualising learning at work, Journal of Workplace Learning, 12, 6, pp. 228-235, (2000)
10 Theory and Practice of Training, (1995)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
69
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers