Article 2003

The politics of curriculum reform in canada: The case of technology education in british columbia

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
Journal · Vol. 3 · Issue 1 · pp. 117-143
Abstract

We argue that the case of technology education in British Columbia demonstrates quite readily the invulnerability of teachers, as a group, to curriculum reform. While technology teachers have been able to negotiate centralized control with relative political ease and autonomy, they have been much more vulnerable to economic and cultural forces. The result of this mix of autonomous, union‐based politics and an ambiguous cultural stance is a stagnant curriculum that averages tradition and innovation. In making this argument, we draw on historical and survey data related to school practices and on Ministry of Education enrolment data disaggregated by sex. Theoretically, we cast these data in a politics of curriculum framework informed by the work of scholars such as Goodson and Hargreaves. © 2003 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Labour Le Travail, (1988)
2 Technology Education, (1990)
3 Transgressing the Technocratic Culture of Technology Education, (1995)
4 Industrial Arts for Public School Administrators, (1930)
5 Art and Labor Ruskin Morris and the Craftsman Ideal in America, (1986)
6 Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, (2000)
7 Training for What Victoria, (1995)
8 Programme of Studies Technical Courses, (1937)
9 Industrial Education, (1977)
10 Computer Studies 11, (1984)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers