Review 2002

Cross-disciplinary competency standards for work-related assessments: Communicating the requirements for effective professional practice

Work
Journal · Vol. 19 · Issue 3 · pp. 269-280
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to introduce the cross-disciplinary competency standards for work-related assessments, why they are needed and how they have been developed in New South Wales (NSW). Cross-disciplinary competency standards communicate the benchmarks for effective performance of work-related assessments. They outline what is expected of rehabilitation professionals, including the ability to apply and transfer competence across different conditions and workplace contexts. Outcomes in occupational rehabilitation are affected by the efficacy of the work-related assessments performed, which is dependent upon competent, clinical decision-making by rehabilitation professionals. However, in Australia, Work-related assessment practice is not governed by universally accepted competency standards or by any competency-based training/education and assessment system. To enhance professional practice, WorkCover NSW has developed cross-disciplinary competency standards for work-related a ssessments. The competencies provide (i) quality standards for professional workplace training and development, (ii) benchmarks for assessing the competence of rehabilitation professionals, (iii) a framework for evidence-based practice, (iv) benchmarks for measuring service quality and (v) "real world" learning outcomes and assessment criteria for professional education programs.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

learning human Humans Occupational diseases interpersonal communication workplace Quality control Vocational education Australia review professional competence professional standard Competence job performance benchmarking professional practice vocational rehabilitation education program occupational therapy Interprofessional Relations Job analysis Rehabilitation, Vocational Work Capacity Evaluation evidence based medicine outcomes research
Author Affiliations
Workplace Injury Mngt. Branch, NS, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association, (1998)
2 Braveman, Brent H., The model of human occupation and prediction of return to work: A review of related empirical research, Work, 12, 1, pp. 13-23, (1999)
3 Competency Based Education and Training A World Perspective, (2025)
4 undefined, (2000)
5 Back Pain in the Workplace Management of Disability in Nonspecific Conditions, (1995)
6 Gibson, Libby A., A review of functional capacity evaluation practice, Work, 9, 1, pp. 3-11, (1997)
7 undefined, (1999)
8 New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, (1997)
9 Innes, Ev, A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 1 - Purposes and problems, Work, 11, 2, pp. 183-189, (1998)
10 Innes, Ev, A clinician's guide to work-related assessments: 2 - Design problems, Work, 11, 2, pp. 191-206, (1998)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
16
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-0036967433
  • PubMed 12547971
  • Language English