Article 2001

The accreditation of work experience: Whose interests are served?

The Learning Organization
Journal · Vol. 8 · Issue 2 · pp. 82-89
Abstract

Analyses of work based learning (such as that offered by Brennan and Little) have typically ignored the issue of ownership of knowledge. Here the authors consider this issue as it relates to accreditation in the UK higher education sector, arguing that the points raised have relevance for the international community. The main argument is that employing organisations are the main beneficiaries of accreditation, and as such universities need to make a much clearer case for work based learning to safeguard learners – and society – from exploitation and the universities from becoming vessels for narrowly defined performance statements, unworthy of higher education. © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Keywords

Author Keywords

Higher education workplace learning United Kingdom accreditation

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Educational Development, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ethics of Aristotle the Nicomachean Ethics, (1976)
2 Knowledge Factory, (2000)
3 Beyond Objectivism and Relativism, (1983)
4 Practical Reason, (1998)
5 A Review of Work Based Learning in Higher Education, (1996)
6 Education and the Market Place, (1994)
7 Higher Education Review, (1999)
8 Carr, Wilfred C., What is an Educational Practice?, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 21, 2, pp. 163-175, (1987)
9 Credential Society an Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification, (1979)
10 Authenticity and Learning Nietzsches Educational Philosophy, (1983)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers