Article 2025

Can co-production enhance professional public service provision? evidence from vocational training programme for people with disabilities in China

Journal of Asian Public Policy
Journal · Vol. 18 · Issue 3 · pp. 745-766
Abstract

Recent research on professional services has sought to pay nuanced attention to the relationship between professionalism and public service performance. At the same time, existing literature has examined the role of co-production in local public service delivery but has primarily remained theoretical and qualitative, calling for more empirical testing. Bridging these two different streams of literature, this article is the first to investigate how co-production affects the performance of China’s vocational training service for disabled persons. Using cross-sectional data from the 2018 national survey conducted by the China Disabled Persons’ Federation, our research shows that training institutions adopting a co-production approach are more likely to achieve higher employment rates (self-reported) among their trainees. Furthermore, multiple measures of professionalism are found to be positively associated with the employment outcomes of vocational training programmes. Implications for future research on professionalism and co-production in public service delivery are also discussed. © 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

co-production Vocational training employment for People with disabilities professional public service

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Institute for Integrity, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
School of Public Administration, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Department of Political Science and Administration, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, Madrid, Spain
Funding & Acknowledgements
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, HUST
Grant: 3034407102
The work was supported by the\u00A0Huazhong University of Science and Technology [3034407102].
References 10 References
1 Aakvik, Arild, Estimating the employment effects of education for disabled workers in Norway, Empirical Economics, 28, 3, pp. 515-533, (2003)
2 Rethinking Public Service Delivery Managing with External Providers, (2012)
3 Amann, Julia, Too Vulnerable to Involve? Challenges of Engaging Vulnerable Groups in the Co-production of Public Services through Research, International Journal of Public Administration, 44, 9, pp. 715-727, (2021)
4 International Journal of Public and Private Healthcare Management and Economics, (2013)
5 Andrews, Rhys, Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, SUPPL. 3, pp. i301-i319, (2011)
6 Bode, Ingo, Publicness in times of market accountability: Lessons from a changing hospital industry in Germany, Public Policy and Administration, 34, 1, pp. 3-21, (2019)
7 Boman, Tomas, Employment opportunities for persons with different types of disability, Alter, 9, 2, pp. 116-129, (2015)
8 Bovaird, Tony, Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services, Public Administration Review, 67, 5, pp. 846-860, (2007)
9 Bovaird, Tony, From engagement to co-production how users and communities contribute to public services, New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, pp. 35-60, (2013)
10 Bozeman, Barry, The "publicness puzzle" in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 2, pp. 197-224, (1994)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers