Article 1982

Economic feasibility of on-the-job training

Economics of Education Review
Journal · Vol. 2 · Issue 2 · pp. 157-173
Abstract

Investing in on-the-job training (OJT) is risky because the value of specific human capital is lost if a permanent separation occurs between the employer and employee. An efficient contract between the two parties can reduce but not eliminate the risk. In theory, some form of "training insurance" could further reduce the risk or eliminate it entirely by pooling risk among employees or employers. The merits of this idea in practice could be determined by field tests, as could the value of ideas for improving the actual process of OJT. © 1982.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
Stanford University, SU
The author is Associate Professor of Education, University of California, Berkeley. Work on this paper was supported by the Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, Stanford University. \[Manuscript received January 30, 1981; revision accepted June 23, 1981.\]
References 10 References
1 Journal of Political Economy, (1975)
2 Baily, Martin Nell, Wages and employment under uncertain demand, Review of Economic Studies, 41, 1, pp. 37-50, (1974)
3 Human Capital, (1964)
4 Industrial and Labor Relations Review, (1959)
5 Review of Economics and Statistics, (1980)
6 Economic Dimensions of Education, (1979)
7 Business Week, (1980)
8 Review of Economics and Statistics, (1980)
9 A Directory of Training and Employment Programs in the Private Sector, (1979)
10 Review of Economics and Statistics, (1979)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers