Article Gold Open Access 2026

An investigation of learner types and their unique preferences on the work-based learning (WBL) model: a case of quantity surveying apprenticeship

Construction Management and Economics
Journal · Vol. 44 · Issue 1 · pp. 1-22
Abstract

Degree Apprenticeships (DA) have grown rapidly as a policy-driven response to skills shortages, particularly in Quantity Surveying (QS), where apprentices integrate occupational skills with academic learning through Work-Based Learning (WBL). However, completion rates remain lower than expected, potentially due to challenges in developing apprentices’ professional identity. This study examines different apprentice profiles and their impact on identity formation and WBL preferences. A descriptive review of literature was conducted to explore debates on DA and WBL pedagogies, followed by semi-structured interviews and Q-methodology to capture and analyse diverse apprentice perspectives and categorise them based on their characteristics. The findings suggest four distinct apprentice profiles: (i) proactive careerists, (ii) studious workers, (iii) resilient strivers, and (iv) university enthusiasts. Alongside these learner types, the study identified key successes such as employer involvement and professional recognition, as well as challenges linked to workload, delivery models, and identity. This identification provides a foundation for optimising WBL through curriculum adjustments, stronger university–industry collaboration, and diversified assessment methods tailored to different learner strengths. This research contributes to ongoing efforts on enhancing DA programmes to promote social mobility and widen participation. The findings highlight the need for apprentice trailblazer groups to consider various delivery modes for DA, offering a more adaptable approach to target different categories of apprentices, leading to improved completion rates and enhanced graduate outcomes. By adopting adaptable and inclusive WBL frameworks that integrate both structured and adaptable learning pathways, institutions can better align with apprentice needs and support professional identity development, engagement, and long-term success. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

work-based learning Professional identity Apprenticeship education learner profiles quantity surveying degree apprenticeship

Index Keywords

Professional aspects Apprentices curriculum survey method Work-Based Learning Surveying Apprenticeship education Identity formation Learner profiles Learning models Policy driven Professional identity Quantity surveying Quantity surveying degree apprenticeship Skill shortage conceptual framework literature review mobility occupational exposure
Author Affiliations
University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Westminster Business School, London, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Koreanische Zeitschrift Fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, (2022)
2 Political Subjectivity Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science, (1980)
3 Ken Q Analysis, (2019)
4 Brodie, Pandy, Assessment in work-based learning: Investigating a pedagogical approach to enhance student learning, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 1, pp. 11-19, (2007)
5 Research in Secondary Teacher Education, (2011)
6 Daniel, Emmanuel Itodo, Apprenticeship for craftspeople in the construction industry: a state-of-the-art review, Education and Training, 62, 2, pp. 159-183, (2020)
7 Daniel, Emmanuel Itodo, Strategies for improving construction craftspeople apprenticeship training programme: Evidence from the UK, Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, (2020)
8 Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Management Procurement and Law, (2024)
9 Apprenticeship Achievements an Update for the Sector, (2024)
10 Apprenticeships Evaluation 2021 Employers, (2024)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers