Article Gold Open Access 2025

Great minds think alike—how homogeneous problem perceptions are associated with successful regulation in collaborative learning groups

Journal of the Learning Sciences
Journal
Abstract

Background: Despite its potential, collaborative learning is not always successful. Learners often have difficulties to overcome regulation problems such as diverging goals within their group. If group members have different (i.e. heterogeneous) perceptions of the group’s current regulation problems, and fail to homogenize them, this may endanger successful collaboration. Methods: N = 311 pre-service teachers collaborated online to analyze a fictional classroom case. Afterward, they individually rated (a) what problems they encountered during collaboration (to arrive at a measure for homogeneity of problem perceptions), (b) their awareness of the heterogeneity of the problem perceptions within their group, and (c) different indicators of regulation success. We additionally analyzed videos and video-recall interviews of groups with pronounced heterogeneous or homogeneous problem perception ratings to better understand how homo-/heterogeneous problem perceptions affect collaboration. Findings: Path models suggest that the homogeneity of problem perceptions was positively related with regulation success. However, awareness of heterogeneity of the problem perceptions within the group was not. Video and interview data indicate that despite knowing about their heterogeneous problem perceptions, learners may be unable to align these perceptions successfully. Contribution: Group members should be supported to arrive at homogeneous problem perceptions to positively influence regulation success in collaborative learning. © 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Psychology with a Special Emphasis on Educational Psychology, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Bayern, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Arthars, Natasha, Constructing shared understanding of complex interdisciplinary problems: Epistemic games in interdisciplinary teamwork, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33, 2, pp. 405-442, (2024)
2 Bächtold, Manuel, Students’ beliefs and attitudes towards cooperative learning, and their relationship to motivation and approach to learning, Studies in Higher Education, 48, 1, pp. 100-112, (2023)
3 Barron, Brigid J.S., When smart groups fail, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 3, pp. 307-359, (2003)
4 Knowledge Creation in Education, (2014)
5 Binali, Theerapong, University students’ profiles of online learning and their relation to online metacognitive regulation and internet-specific epistemic justification, Computers and Education, 175, (2021)
6 Bodemer, Daniel, Group awareness tools for computer-supported collaborative learning, International Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 351-358, (2018)
7 Borge, Marcela, How teams learn to regulate collaborative processes with technological support, Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 3, pp. 661-690, (2022)
8 Borge, Marcela, Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 1, pp. 61-92, (2018)
9 Chen, Wenli, The role of individual preparation before collaboration: An exploratory study on students’ computer-supported collaborative argumentation in a primary classroom, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33, 4-5, pp. 757-798, (2024)
10 Chi, Michelene T.H., The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes, Educational Psychologist, 49, 4, pp. 219-243, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers