Conference paper 2025

Debates Using ChatGPT: Formats and Impact on Students' Cognitive and Affective Perceptions in the Pedagogical Course

2025 11th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies, ICETT 2025
Conference · pp. 40-44
Abstract

This study aims to explore the impact of ChatGPT on students' perceptions during debates in a pedagogical course. The authors developed four innovative formats of in-class debate involving ChatGPT, where artificial intelligence acts as a consultant, an opponent, an expert or combined roles. Data was collected from a survey of 84 students of four academic groups and statistically analyzed using CAP Perceived Learning Scale. Results of the study was explorer with analyze ANOVA. Findings reveal that using ChatGPT-3.5 as an opponent and an expert has the most profound impact on student’s cognitive and affective perceptions, opening new opportunities for fostering critical thinking and active learning. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for effectively integrating artificial intelligence into teaching and learning. ©2025 IEEE.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Higher education Artificial intelligence Perceptions affective learning cognitive learning debate

Index Keywords

Teaching Curricula High educations Education computing Students artificial intelligence Student perceptions Active learning Critical thinking Affective learning Cognitive learning Debate In-class debates Pedagogical course Perceived learning
Author Affiliations
Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al-Khwarizmi, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Kamalov, Firuz, New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15, 16, (2023)
2 International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, (2007)
3 Chen, Xinya, Exploring college students’ depth and processing patterns of critical thinking skills and their perception in argument map(AM)-supported online group debate activities, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, (2024)
4 Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, (2016)
5 Guo, Kai, Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation, Computers and Education, 203, (2023)
6 Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, (2011)
7 Hartin, Peter, A debate about the merits of debate in nurse education, Nurse Education in Practice, 26, pp. 118-120, (2017)
8 McGee, Edoabasi U., Assessment of structured classroom debate to teach an antimicrobial stewardship elective course, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12, 2, pp. 220-227, (2020)
9 Bond, Rucha, How Debate Could Facilitate Group Function in Pharmacy Schools, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87, 3, pp. 333-337, (2023)
10 Georgallis, P. G., Sustainability teaching using case-based debates, Journal of International Education in Business, 15, 1, pp. 147-163, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers