Article 2026

Enhancing furniture production and process management knowledge in woodworking students using VR CAVE technology and collaborative task allocation strategy

Interactive Learning Environments
Journal · Vol. 34 · Issue 1 · pp. 392-413
Abstract

Furniture production is a complex process, requiring manufacturers to possess the knowledge and skills needed for effective production and process management. In Taiwan, most schools are unable to provide hands-on training for students to acquire furniture production skills due to limited space and facilities. To address this issue, the present study employed a VR CAVE system for task allocation and furniture production simulation. The training was conducted in groups to strengthen students’ understanding of furniture production and process management. This study recruited 40 freshmen majoring in furniture design to participate in the training. They were divided into two groups: an experimental group (20 students receiving VR CAVE training) and a control group (20 students receiving traditional training). The training covered various aspects, including personnel, equipment, and production line operations aligned with the furniture production process. The effectiveness of this training was evaluated through a combination of tests and observations. The results revealed that students who underwent VR CAVE training and actively engaged in furniture production within a collaborative, task-oriented environment showed significant improvements in their knowledge of furniture production and process management. This innovative approach could effectively address the teaching challenges encountered by traditional furniture vocational schools. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

furniture production production manufacturing task allocation virtual production line VR CAVE

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Industrial Design, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
Ministry of Education, MOE
Grant: PHA1090553, PHA1110069, PHA1121013
This work was supported by Ministry of Education Republic of China (Taiwan) [grant numbers PHA1090553, PHA1110069 & PHA1121013].
Ministry of Education, MOE
This work was supported by Ministry of Education Republic of China (Taiwan) [grant numbers PHA1090553, PHA1110069 & PHA1121013].
References 10 References
1 Allcoat, Devon, Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement, Research in Learning Technology, 26, (2018)
2 Blascovich, Jim J., Immersive virtual environments and education simulations, Virtual Decisions: Digital Simulations for Teaching Reasoning in the Social Sciences and Humanities, pp. 229-253, (2005)
3 How Nations Learn Technological Learning Industrial Policy and Catch Up, (2019)
4 Cyma-Wejchenig, Magdalena, The influence of proprioceptive training with the use of virtual reality on postural stability of workers working at height, Sensors (Switzerland), 20, 13, pp. 1-17, (2020)
5 Endsley, Mica R., Situation awareness: operationally necessary and scientifically grounded, Cognition, Technology and Work, 17, 2, pp. 163-167, (2015)
6 Hamilton, D., Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design, Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 1, pp. 1-32, (2021)
7 Hilfert, Thomas, Low-cost virtual reality environment for engineering and construction, Visualization in Engineering, 4, 1, (2016)
8 Horst, Jeremy A., Observation, assisting, apprenticeship: Cycles of visual and kinesthetic learning in dental education, Journal of Dental Education, 73, 8, pp. 919-933, (2009)
9 Journal of Furniture Interior Design, (2001)
10 Huang, Yaling, Alternative technological learning paths of Taiwanese firms, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 27, 3, pp. 301-314, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers