Article Gold Open Access 2025

Skill-Biased Policy Change: Governing the Transition to the Knowledge Economy in Germany, Sweden and Britain

Regulation and Governance
Journal
Abstract

How have advanced capitalist democracies transitioned from a Fordist to a post-Fordist, knowledge-based economy? And why have they followed seemingly similar policy trajectories despite different economic models and sectoral specializations? We develop the notion of skill-biased policy change to answer these questions. Drawing on a distinction between valence and partisan issues in the transition to the knowledge economy, we highlight the partisan and business group politics underpinning different policy areas to argue that policies that create or mobilize high-level skills attract relatively broader consensus across political parties and business groups than protective labor market policies targeted at the lower end of the skills distribution. The argument is illustrated through case studies of Germany, Sweden, and the UK—three countries that have transitioned to a knowledge-based economy but that have done so by relying on markedly different sectoral specializations. © 2025 The Author(s). Regulation & Governance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

technology knowledge economy Digital transition high skills skill-biased policy change

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, Department of Communication and Economics, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
Department of Political Economy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Department of Political and Social Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, BO, Italy
Funding & Acknowledgements
Leverhulme Trust
Grant: RPG‐2022‐151
This work was supported by Leverhulme Trust, RPG\u20102022\u2010151. Funding:
Leverhulme Trust
This work was supported by Leverhulme Trust, RPG\u20102022\u2010151. Funding:
References 10 References
1 Acemoglu, Daron, Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1, pp. 7-72, (2002)
2 Addison, John T., The demise of a model? The state of collective bargaining and worker representation in Germany, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38, 2, pp. 193-234, (2017)
3 Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M., The regional effects of Germany's national minimum wage, Economics Letters, 172, pp. 127-130, (2018)
4 Ge Larosatena Incitament Att Starka Svensk Kompetens Hog Tid for Kvalitetshojande Reformer Inom Hogre Utbildning Och Forskning Give Institutions the Incentive to Strengthen Swedish Competence It S High Time for Quality Enhancing Reforms in Higher Education and Research, (2023)
5 Government and Opposition, (2024)
6 Anxo, Dominique, The Swedish model in turbulent times: Decline or renaissance?, International Labour Review, 145, 4, pp. 339-371, (2006)
7 Aea Papers and Proceedings, (2020)
8 Baccaro, Lucio, Throwing out the ballast: Growth models and the liberalization of German industrial relations, Socio-Economic Review, 15, 1, pp. 85-115, (2017)
9 Baccaro, Lucio, Trajectories of neoliberal transformation: European industrial relations since the 1970s, Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations Since the 1970s, pp. 1-261, (2017)
10 Baccaro, Lucio, The politics of growth models, Review of Keynesian Economics, 10, 2, pp. 204-221, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers