Conference paper 2025

Exploring Teacher Beliefs about Teaching AI Ethics Under National Curriculum Reform: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective

Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education
Conference · pp. 51-56
Abstract

This study investigates secondary school teachers’ beliefs about teaching AI ethics within the context of China’s national curriculum reform. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the research analyzes semi-structured interviews with 14 in-service technology teachers experienced in delivering AI curricula. Findings reveal teachers’ beliefs across three TPB domains: 1) behavioral beliefs (perceived benefits and challenges of teaching AI ethics), 2) normative beliefs (social and institutional expectations), and 3) control beliefs (perceived self-efficacy and resource availability). These insights highlight the complex interplay between personal, social, and structural factors shaping AI ethics education. The study contributes to the growing discourse on AI literacy by offering evidence-based recommendations for teacher professional development and curriculum design, ultimately supporting effective AI education integration in schools. © 2025, The Education University of Hong Kong. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Curriculum reform Teacher beliefs AI ethics education Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Action Control, (1985)
2 Ajzen, Icek, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 2, pp. 179-211, (1991)
3 Borko, Hilda, Learning to teach, Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 673-708, (2013)
4 Bryan, Lynn A., Research on science teacher beliefs, Second International Handbook of Science Education, pp. 477-495, (2012)
5 Ham, Miriam, What role do teachers' beliefs play in the implementation of educational reform?: Nepali teachers’ voice., Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, (2019)
6 Handal, Boris, Mathematics teachers' beliefs and curriculum reform, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15, 1, pp. 59-69, (2003)
7 Kagan, Dona M., Ways of Evaluating Teacher Cognition: Inferences Concerning the Goldilocks Principle, Review of Educational Research, 60, 3, pp. 419-469, (1990)
8 Kong, Siu Cheung, Developing an artificial intelligence literacy framework: Evaluation of a literacy course for senior secondary students using a project-based learning approach, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, (2024)
9 Proceedings of the 2020 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2020)
10 Ng, Tsz Kit Davy, A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020, Education and Information Technologies, 28, 7, pp. 8445-8501, (2023)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-105011820392
  • Language English