Conference paper 2025

Memoire: Harnessing Generative AI to Bridge the Metacognitive Gap in Reflective Writing

CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Conference · Vol. 3994 · pp. 65-73
Abstract

Reflective writing is considered an important metacognitive skill, especially in vocational education where students must bridge theoretical knowledge and practical experiences. However, meaningful reflection often requires supervision and guidance, as students struggle to make connections between classroom concepts and workplace experiences. While generative large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in such educational applications including personalized learning and writing support, their effectiveness is hindered by inherent issues such as hallucination and lack of personalization. To address this, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a solution to enable models to integrate external information in text generation. While RAG has demonstrated success in various domains, its potential for enhancing reflective writing remains untapped. In this work-in-progress, we introduce Memoire, a writing assistant designed to utilize the capabilities of RAG to support students in reflective writing. By leveraging external knowledge and memory from prior reflections of each student, Memoire helps them write reflections that are both insightful and grounded in accurate prior information. We also conduct a pre-study to evaluate and compare three modalities of providing writing support in the domain of reflective writing from prior works. Finally, we introduce our study design plan for an in-classroom evaluation of Memoire. © 2025 Copyright for this paper by its authors.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Generative AI Intelligent Learning Support Large Language Models Reflective Writing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Writing Assistants

Index Keywords

Learning systems Teaching Apprentices Education computing Students artificial intelligence Knowledge management Language model Metacognitives Generative AI Intelligent learning Intelligent learning support Large language model Learning support Reflective writing Retrieval-augmented generation Writing assistant
Author Affiliations
EPFL, Ecublens, Switzerland
Funding & Acknowledgements
Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation, SBFI
This project was substantially financed by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research, and Innovation (SERI).
Spine Education and Research Institute, SERI
This project was substantially financed by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research, and Innovation (SERI).
References 10 References
1 Reflective Writing, (2012)
2 O'Loughlin, Valerie Dean, Developing Student Metacognition through Reflective Writing in an Upper Level Undergraduate Anatomy Course, Anatomical Sciences Education, 13, 6, pp. 680-693, (2020)
3 Colomer, Jordi, Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices, Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 9, (2020)
4 Cattaneo, Alberto A.P., Individual and collaborative writing-to-learn activities in vocational education: An overview of different instructional strategies, Writing for Professional Development, pp. 188-208, (2015)
5 Indonesian Efl Journal, (2020)
6 Prior, Julia Coleman, Reflection is hard: Teaching and learning reflective practice in a software studio, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01-05-February-2016, (2016)
7 Alrashidi, Huda A., Evaluating an Automated Analysis Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Approaches to Classify Computer Science Students’ Reflective Writing, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 475, pp. 463-477, (2023)
8 Schwendimann, Beat Adrian, The ‘Erfahrraum’: a pedagogical model for designing educational technologies in dual vocational systems, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 67, 3, pp. 367-396, (2015)
9 Journal of Research Method in Education, (2015)
10 McGuire, Lisa E., Reflective Pedagogy for Social Work Education: Integrating Classroom and Field for Competency-Based Education, Journal of Social Work Education, 56, 3, pp. 519-532, (2020)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-105011254844
  • Language English