Article 2025

Teaching through ‘powerful knowledge’ in vocational higher education: tensions of ‘relational’ approaches in China

Teaching in Higher Education
Journal · Vol. 30 · Issue 8 · pp. 1973-1990
Abstract

This study addresses the problem of knowledge practices in Chinese vocational higher education institutions (HEIs) by using Bernstein's notion of a ‘pedagogic device’. China's distinctive context is characterised by a hybrid mix of discipline-based and competence-based curricula, providing a unique opportunity to explore the tensions inherent in a ‘relational’ approach. One specific concern is epistemic and social relations behind curriculum choices. A qualitative study of 29 experienced teachers revealed that government curriculum policies have led to the emergence of two types of vocationally oriented HEIs with differentiated knowledge foundations, of which teachers’ perceptions are influenced by the structure of occupational practice and the profiles of specific learners. The findings revealed that teaching through ‘powerful knowledge’ in vocational higher education goes beyond merely emphasising systematic knowledge. Instead, it necessitates acknowledging the role of power in defining what knowledge should/should not be taught and who is permitted access to it. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational higher education pedagogic device Powerful knowledge relational curriculum approach

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, MOE
Grant: EAA230469
This work was supported by National Project for Education Sciences Planning, Ministry of Education, China (Grant Number: EAA230469). The first author contributes to the abstract in a second language.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, MOE
This work was supported by National Project for Education Sciences Planning, Ministry of Education, China (Grant Number: EAA230469). The first author contributes to the abstract in a second language.
References 10 References
1 Allais, Stephanie Matseleng, Selling out education: National qualifications frameworks and the neglect of knowledge, Selling Out Education: National Qualifications Frameworks and the Neglect of Knowledge, pp. 1-274, (2014)
2 Annala, Johanna, What knowledge counts—boundaries of knowledge in cross-institutional curricula in higher education, Higher Education, 85, 6, pp. 1299-1315, (2023)
3 Apple, Michael W., Ideology and curriculum: Third edition, Ideology and Curriculum: Third Edition, pp. 1-234, (2004)
4 Ashwin, Paul, Understanding educational development in terms of the collective creation of socially-just curricula, Teaching in Higher Education, 27, 8, pp. 979-991, (2022)
5 Pedagogy Symbolic Control and Identity Theory Research Critique, (1996)
6 Class Codes and Control Theoretical Studies Towards A Sociology of Language, (1971)
7 Blackie, Margaret, Building knowledge for higher education: engaging with the legacy of Suellen Shay, Teaching in Higher Education, 27, 8, pp. 953-961, (2022)
8 Chinese Education Since 1949 Academic and Revolutionary Models, (1981)
9 Clegg, Sue, The necessity and possibility of powerful ‘regional’ knowledge: curriculum change and renewal, Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 4, pp. 457-470, (2016)
10 Durden, Geoffrey R., Higher vocational education in China: A preliminary critical review of developments and issues in Liaoning province, Journal of European Industrial Training, 30, 8, pp. 622-638, (2006)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers