Article 2025

The role of digital technology in authentic assessment: perspectives of university educators

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Journal
Abstract

Authentic assessment is widely recognised as a strategy for preparing university students for future. Although the use of digital technologies in authentic assessment is increasing, there is limited understanding of why and how educators choose to integrate technology in these practices. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study through semi-structured interviews of 21 university educators from diverse disciplines and institutional contexts to explore their approaches. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified four pedagogical purposes guiding technology use: enhancing disciplinary learning, supporting workplace readiness, fostering personal development, and enabling assessment delivery. The findings show that educators often adapt familiar and accessible technologies to support student learning, rather than prioritising novelty or innovation. Technology serves multiple functions across the assessment process, and its effectiveness depends on alignment with pedagogical intent and student needs. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of technology integration and offers practical implications for supporting purposeful and student-centred assessment design. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Digital technology Authentic assessment reflexive thematic analysis

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Centre for Educational Design and Innovation, University of Otago, Dunedin, OTA, New Zealand, School of Languages and Cultures, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan, China
Centre for Educational Design and Innovation, University of Otago, Dunedin, OTA, New Zealand
Centre for Educational Design and Innovation, University of Otago, Dunedin, OTA, New Zealand, Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ajjawi, Rola, From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49, 4, pp. 499-510, (2024)
2 Arnold, Lydia, Is it time to stop talking about authentic assessment?, Teaching in Higher Education, 30, 3, pp. 735-743, (2025)
3 Bearman, Margaret L., Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49, 6, pp. 893-905, (2024)
4 Boud, David J., Aligning assessment with long-term learning, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 4, pp. 399-413, (2006)
5 Braun, Virginia, Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21, 1, pp. 37-47, (2021)
6 Brown, Melanie, Implementing a strategic campus-wide approach to authentic assessment: considerations and recommendations for implementation, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 12, 5, pp. 914-927, (2022)
7 Bryant, Peter, Student experience and digital storytelling: Integrating the authentic interaction of students work, life, play and learning into the co-design of university teaching practices, Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11, pp. 14051-14069, (2023)
8 Byrne, David, A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis, Quality and Quantity, 56, 3, pp. 1391-1412, (2022)
9 Fawns, Tim, Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 50, 3, pp. 396-408, (2025)
10 Gaba, David M., The future vision of simulation in healthcare., Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 2, pp. 126-135, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers