Article 2025

Promoting gender equity in an information technology course through 6E-oriented STEM instruction on Health and Well-Being

Research in Science and Technological Education
Journal
Abstract

Background: The integration of the 6E instructional model into STEM education, focusing on Health and Well-Being, has gained attention for its potential to enhance students’ computational thinking and self-efficacy. However, limited research exists on how this approach addresses gender-specific needs in vocational education, particularly in terms of reducing gender disparities in STEM skills. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the impact of integrating ‘6E-oriented STEM instruction on Health and Well-Being’ into an IT course on vocational high school students’ computational thinking abilities and self-efficacy. The research also investigated whether the curriculum differentially impacted male and female students, focusing on gender-related differences in these outcomes. Sample: The study involved 67 second-year vocational high school students in Taiwan. Design and Methods: A quasi-experimental design with pretest-post-test control groups was used. Data collection included computational thinking tests and self-efficacy questionnaires administered before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis, utilizing paired t-tests and ANCOVA, was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the intervention and examine gender differences. Results: Findings indicate that the ‘6E-oriented STEM instruction on Health and Well-Being’ significantly enhanced students’ computational thinking abilities and self-efficacy. The curriculum’s human care themes had a particularly positive effect on female students’ computational thinking and self-efficacy. Additionally, gender differences were observed, with female students benefiting more from the curriculum’s focus on real-world health issues. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the potential of the 6E instructional model to improve computational thinking and self-efficacy, particularly among female students. Future research should explore the long-term effects of this approach and its applicability in diverse educational contexts, as well as investigate how curriculum design can further address gender differences in STEM education. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Gender self-efficacy STEM education Computational thinking teacher actions

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Aerosol Science Research Center, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Aslan, Ümit, Why are some students “not into” computational thinking activities embedded within high school science units? Key takeaways from a microethnographic discourse analysis study, Science Education, 108, 3, pp. 929-956, (2024)
2 Ayers, Katherine Ann, Not the only novice in the room: Partnerships and belongingness in a research immersion program, Science Education, 108, 5, pp. 1269-1291, (2024)
3 Bandura, Albert, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977)
4 Technology and Engineering Teacher, (2014)
5 Bounou, Aikaterini, Correlation between High School Students’ Computational Thinking and Their Performance in STEM and Language Courses, Education Sciences, 13, 11, (2023)
6 Buday, Sarah K., Gender and the Choice of a Science Career: The Impact of Social Support and Possible Selves, Sex Roles, 66, 3-4, pp. 197-209, (2012)
7 Campos, Diego G., Digital gender gaps in Students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills: an integrative data analysis across 32 Countries, Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1, pp. 655-693, (2024)
8 Chan, Randolph Chun Ho, A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self-efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): the influence of cultural and gender norms, International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 1, (2022)
9 Charlesworth, Tessa E.S., Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions, Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 37, pp. 7228-7243, (2019)
10 Chen, Jyunchen, Developing a hands-on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 1, pp. 46-60, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers