Article Gold Open Access 2025

Cognitive Autonomy Development among Adolescents: A Study of University Students in Indonesia

Educational Process: International Journal
Journal · Vol. 16 · Art. e2025208
Abstract

Background/purpose. This research aims to explore each component of the cognitive autonomy of Indonesian students, who are mostly 17 to 20-year-olds. Materials/methods. Quantitative method with survey types was used in this research. The research sample consisted of 100 first-semester students at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret (12 male and 88 female students). The research sample was spread across 20 teacher training and education faculty study programs. The research sample consisted of 100 respondents. Questionnaires were used to collect data. The instrument's validity was tested using product-moment correlation with a score of 0.195 (valid). The instrument's reliability was tested using the Cronbach alpha formula, with a 0.79 (reliable) score. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics with the Microsoft Excel application. Results. The research findings show that students' cognitive autonomy was adequate, with an indicator of evaluative thinking obtaining 4.13 (82.54%), voicing opinions at 3.66 (73.20%), decision-making at 3.91 (78.10%), self-assessment at 3.48 (69.60%), and comparative validation at 3.91 (78.20%). The indicator of evaluative thinking becomes the most dominant, while the indicator of self-assessment becomes the lowest indicator. The score acquisition is caused by age, gender, peers, teacher's role, social condition, academic performance, learning environment, learning experience, emotional state, learning motivation, education, and student habituation. Conclusion. This research concludes that most students have had cognitive autonomy, which is characterized by the possession of all indicators of cognitive autonomy. Future research is recommended to conduct research in early childhood to support the elements of cognitive autonomy appropriately, as well as research that focuses on emotional and behavioral autonomy to observe greater potential. © The Author(s), 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Adolescence self-assessment Decision-making cognitive autonomy comparative validation

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen, Kebumen, Indonesia
Educational Technology Master Study Program, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Universitas Sebelas Maret
The author would like to thank the Rector of Universitas Sebelas Maret for directing and facilitating the implementation of this research. The author would also like to thank all students of the faculty of teacher training and education who have been willing to be research respondents.
References 10 References
1 Abdullah, Alhassan, Moving towards independent living in Ghana: Narratives from young adults about their kinship care experience, Journal of Adolescence, 79, pp. 148-156, (2020)
2 Alzoubi, Haitham M., Does emotional intelligence contribute to quality of strategic decisions? The mediating role of open innovation, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, 2, (2021)
3 Archibald, Thomas G., The role of evaluative thinking in the teaching of evaluation, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 35, 3, pp. 310-319, (2021)
4 Archibald, Thomas G., Evaluative thinking, Research Handbook on Program Evaluation, pp. 35-49, (2024)
5 Konstruksi Tes Kemampuan Kognitif, (2016)
6 Barbosa, Paola Vargas, Autonomy in adolescence: Reviewing concepts, models and variables, Estudos de Psicologia, 18, 4, pp. 649-658, (2013)
7 Beasley, Rhianna E., Childhood Maltreatment and Psychosis: A Comparative Validity Study of Maltreatment Indices, Child Maltreatment, 26, 2, pp. 228-237, (2021)
8 Fostering Autonomy in Adolescents A Model of Cognitive Autonomy and Self Evaluation, (2005)
9 Beckert, Troy E., Cognitive autonomy and self-evaluation in adolescence: A conceptual investigation and instrument development, North American Journal of Psychology, 9, 3, pp. 579-594, (2007)
10 Survey Research Method and Application, (2012)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers