Book 2025

Equity in K–12 STEM Education: Framing Decisions for the Future

Equity in K–12 STEM Education: Framing Decisions for the Future
Journal · pp. 1-412
Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) live in the American imagination as promising tools for solving pressing global challenges and enhancing quality of life. Despite the importance of the STEM disciplines in the landscape of U.S. political, economic, and social priorities, STEM learning opportunities are unevenly distributed, and the experiences an individual has in STEM education are likely to vary tremendously based on their race, ethnicity, socio-economic class, gender, and a myriad of other factors. Equity in K-12 STEM Education: Framing Decisions for the Future approaches equity in STEM education not as a singular goal but as an ongoing process that requires intentional decision-making and action toward addressing and disrupting existing inequities and envisioning a more just future. Stakeholders at all levels of the education system - including state, district, and school leaders and classroom teachers - have roles as decision-makers who can advance equity. This consensus study report provides five equity frames as a guide to help decision-makers articulate short- and long-term goals for equity and make decisions about policy and practice. © 2025 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Not provided
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Atran, Scott M., Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 4, pp. 547-609, (1998)
2 Bang, Megan, Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 35, pp. 13868-13874, (2007)
3 Students Civic Online Reasoning A National Portrait, (2019)
4 2023 State of Computer Science Education, (2023)
5 Colloff, Matthew J., An integrative research framework for enabling transformative adaptation, Environmental Science and Policy, 68, pp. 87-96, (2017)
6 Davis, Natalie Renee, Troubling Troubled Waters in Elementary Science Education: Politics, Ethics & Black Children’s Conceptions of Water [Justice] in the Era of Flint, Cognition and Instruction, 37, 3, pp. 367-389, (2019)
7 Monthly Labor Review, (2025)
8 Gopnik, Alison, A Theory of Causal Learning in Children: Causal Maps and Bayes Nets, Psychological Review, 111, 1, pp. 3-32, (2004)
9 Green, Fergus, How inequality fuels climate change: The climate case for a Green New Deal, One Earth, 5, 6, pp. 635-649, (2022)
10 Climate Change and Society Sociological Perspectives, (2015)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
40
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers