Article Gold Open Access 2025

A scaffolding model for designing and implementing work-integrated learning experiences based on the analysis of the university and company's arrangements

Higher Education
Journal
Abstract

In response to the lack of field experience perceived by employers and recent STEM graduates, Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) arrangements have become more common. However, not all WIL experiences are valuable. Indeed, having students in companies without establishing protocols to protect their participation, meaningful interaction, and psychological safety could be counterproductive to non-traditional students. Furthermore, WIL experiences must be designed purposefully to ensure equitable learning experiences for all students. This paper applies an inductive thematic analysis of interviews with 19 current and 4 former students, interviews with current and former workers at host worksites, 76 course surveys, and a total of 15 memos collected from class and workplace observations from graduate engineering classes designed under WIL arrangements between 2017 and 2022. Using Communities of Practice (CoP), we conceptualize WIL experiences as a connection between two communities, generating a theory-based understanding of different possible types of connection, how to establish those connections, and how they contribute to student learning. Building from student experiences, vital elements to integrate workplace learning into the curriculum effectively were identified. Leveraging CoP theory concepts, we describe various modes of integrating workplace experiences into the curriculum, supporting students’ increased participation in both settings and allowing them to become brokers who can transfer ideas and knowledge and acquire new skills. From this, we propose a scaffolding model to implement WIL, which enables teachers to select from among several effective strategies that adapt to students' unique contexts, prior experiences, and learning objectives. For all strategies, guidance is provided about designing WIL experiences that progressively immerse students as engaged, active participants in companies. © The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

communities of practice work-integrated learning Scaffolding learning University company arrangements

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of STEM Education, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States, National Center for Artificial Intelligence, Santiago, RM, Chile
Department of STEM Education, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
Construction, NC State College of Engineering, Raleigh, NC, United States
NC State College of Engineering, Raleigh, NC, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
National Science Foundation, NSF
Grant: NSF 210555, 1954946
Funding text 1: The authors thank the support of the National Science Foundation, Grant NSF 210555. Additionally, the first author thanks the support of the National Center for Artificial Intelligence CENIA FB210017, Basal ANID.; Funding text 2: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 1954946.
National Science Foundation, NSF
Funding text 1: The authors thank the support of the National Science Foundation, Grant NSF 210555. Additionally, the first author thanks the support of the National Center for Artificial Intelligence CENIA FB210017, Basal ANID.; Funding text 2: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 1954946.
Grant: FB210017
Funding text 1: The authors thank the support of the National Science Foundation, Grant NSF 210555. Additionally, the first author thanks the support of the National Center for Artificial Intelligence CENIA FB210017, Basal ANID.; Funding text 2: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant 1954946.
References 10 References
1 Ajjawi, Rola, Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: the challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 2, pp. 304-316, (2020)
2 Alam, Gazi Mahabubul, What makes a difference for further advancement of engineers: socioeconomic background or education programs?, Higher Education, 83, 6, pp. 1259-1278, (2022)
3 Routledge International Handbook of Nurse Education, (2019)
4 Arranz, Nieves, University-enterprise cooperation for the employability of higher education graduates: a social capital approach, Studies in Higher Education, 47, 5, pp. 990-999, (2022)
5 Arsenis, Panagiotis, Do professional year placements matter for job quality? The case of economics graduates, Studies in Higher Education, 49, 1, pp. 178-191, (2024)
6 undefined, (2022)
7 Baas, Marjon, The role of brokers in cultivating an inter-institutional community around open educational resources in higher education, Higher Education, 85, 5, pp. 999-1019, (2023)
8 Björck, Ville, The idea of academia and the real world and its ironic role in the discourse on Work-integrated Learning, Studies in Continuing Education, 42, 1, pp. 1-16, (2020)
9 Björck, Ville, Taking issue with how the Work-integrated Learning discourse ascribes a dualistic meaning to graduate employability, Higher Education, 82, 2, pp. 307-322, (2021)
10 Björck, Ville, Problematising the theory–practice terminology: a discourse analysis of students’ statements on Work-integrated Learning, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43, 10, pp. 1363-1375, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers