Article Gold Open Access 2025

Mid-level qualifications in the divided tertiary education systems in Australia and England

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Journal · Vol. 47 · Issue 3 · pp. 386-405
Abstract

The Universities Accord 2024 in Australia and the Augar Review 2019 in England both argue for a more cohesive tertiary education system and consider promoting mid-level qualifications. This paper compares the roles of mid-level qualifications in the two countries’ current systems. We review government reports and analyse national statistics, and find that despite England’s population being three times larger, Australia’s mid-level qualification enrolments were three times higher, mainly driven by Diplomas and Advanced Diplomas. Both countries have intricate networks of mid-level qualification providers and funding systems that prioritise Bachelor’s Degrees over mid-level qualifications. However, England has recently announced a new funding policy, the life-long learning entitlement, which was motivated partly to promote participation in mid-level qualifications. In contrast, a significant barrier for Australia is its complex funding system involving both state and federal governments. These findings suggest a need to consider reforms to possibly expand the role of mid-level qualifications. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Tertiary education associate degree foundation degree joined up tertiary education system Mid-level qualification

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
King's College London, KCL
We would like to express our gratitude to Professor Alison Wolf (King\u2019s College London), Principal Researcher Andrew Wade (CIRES, VU), Associate Prof. Peter Hurley (Mitchell Institute), and Professor Tom Bentley (RMIT) who reviewed and provided valuable feedback on this article prior to submission. We would also like to thank members of Mitchell Institute, who participated in the roundtable discussion of the paper.
Mitchell Institute
We would like to express our gratitude to Professor Alison Wolf (King\u2019s College London), Principal Researcher Andrew Wade (CIRES, VU), Associate Prof. Peter Hurley (Mitchell Institute), and Professor Tom Bentley (RMIT) who reviewed and provided valuable feedback on this article prior to submission. We would also like to thank members of Mitchell Institute, who participated in the roundtable discussion of the paper.
References 10 References
1 Education and Work Australia May 2023, (2023)
2 A Review of Possible Inclusion of an Associate Degree in the Australian Qualifications Framework Discussion Paper, (2003)
3 Allen, Jennifer, The bachelor’s degree in college systems: history, evidence and argument from England, London Review of Education, 20, 1, (2022)
4 Aqf Website Introduction of Associate Degree in 2004, (2004)
5 Aqf Qualifications, (2021)
6 Australias Dual Sector Universities Call for A More Coherent Post Secondary System, (2020)
7 Independent Panel Report to the Review of Post 18 Education and Funding, (2019)
8 How Student Loans Work Study Assist Australian Government, (2024)
9 Information for Vet Student Loans Students, (2024)
10 Bathmaker, Ann Marie, Dual-sector further and higher education: Policies, organisations and students in transition, Research Papers in Education, 23, 2, pp. 125-137, (2008)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers