Article Gold Open Access 2024

The Effect of Collaborative Learning Service Quality on the Innovative Work Behavior of High-Tech Engineers

Administrative Sciences
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 12 · Art. 317
Abstract

Corporations are increasingly looking beyond inter-company collaborations to multidimensional collaborative activities between departments and organizational members within the company to strengthen innovative market competitiveness. High-tech corporations, specifically, are adopting collaborative learning approaches to promote work capability among engineers from the perspective of developing new technologies and increasing productivity. This study aimed to empirically verify the effect of the service quality of collaborative learning programs on the innovative work behavior of engineers in high-tech companies. Job autonomy, self-efficacy, and learning transfer were set as mediating variables and their effects on innovative work behavior were analyzed. The sample comprised 298 high-tech engineers in South Korea. Collaborative learning service quality was found to have a direct positive effect on job autonomy, self-efficacy, and learning transfer. However, job autonomy and self-efficacy did not influence innovative work behavior through learning transfer. On the other hand, collaborative learning quality had a positive effect on innovative work behavior through learning transfer. Thus, improving the service quality of collaborative learning programs in high-tech corporations can enhance learning transfer within the organization, leading to innovative business outcomes. Moreover, to maximize the effectiveness of collaborative learning, the service quality of learning programs can be improved by prioritizing learning transfer rather than job autonomy or self-efficacy. © 2024 by the authors.

Keywords

Author Keywords

collaborative learning Innovative Work Behavior high-tech engineer service quality

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
aSSIST University, Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Funding & Acknowledgements
Assiut University, AU
This paper is supported by research funding from aSSIST University.
References 10 References
1 Abdullah, Firdaus, Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 24, 1, pp. 31-47, (2006)
2 Educational Research and Reviews, (2020)
3 Akhavan, Peyman, Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors: An integrated theoretical view and empirical examination, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67, 5, pp. 562-591, (2015)
4 Moorthy, Anitha Dhakshina, Improving problem-solving skills through technology assisted collaborative learning in a first year engineering mathematics course, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20, 4, pp. 534-553, (2023)
5 Apte, Manoj M., Cooperative Learning techniques to bridge gaps in academia and corporate, Procedia Computer Science, 172, pp. 289-295, (2020)
6 Arad, Sharon, A framework for the study of relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation, Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 1, pp. 42-58, (1997)
7 Argote, Linda M., Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Learning, The wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement, pp. 154-170, (2014)
8 Management and Administrative Sciences Review, (2016)
9 Battistelli, Adalgisa, Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30, 3, pp. 361-381, (2019)
10 Baumberger-Henry, Mary L., Cooperative learning and case study: Does the combination improve students' perception of problem-solving and decision making skills?, Nurse Education Today, 25, 3, pp. 238-246, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers