Article Gold Open Access 2024

A scheduling perspective on modular educational systems in Europe

Heliyon
Journal · Vol. 10 · Issue 21 · Art. e39694
Abstract

In modular educational systems, students are allowed to choose a part of their curriculum themselves. The rationale behind letting students choose their courses themselves is to enhance self-responsibility, improve student motivation, and allow for focus on specific areas of interest. A central instrument for bringing these systems to fruition is the timetable. However, scheduling the timetable in such systems can be an extremely challenging and time-consuming task. In this study, we present a framework for classifying modular educational systems in Europe that reflects different degrees of freedom regarding student choices and explore the consequences from the perspective of scheduling a timetable that satisfies all requirements from the organizational and pedagogical perspectives. For this purpose, we conducted interviews in Austria, Germany, Finland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, and applied the framework to these educational systems, finding that among them the Finnish system shows the highest degree of modularity. After analyzing the consequences of modularity from the scheduling perspective, we assess the necessity for automated scheduling methods, which are central to realizing the potential and many benefits of modular education. The framework developed in this paper can be used by educational systems to assess their degree of modularity and consider the right approach to timetabling based on it. © 2024 The Author(s)

Keywords

Author Keywords

Modular education Scheduling Timetabling

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
IMC Fachhochschule Krems GmbH, Krems an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria
Planimize, Gardanne, France
Untis GmbH, Stockerau, Austria
Funding & Acknowledgements
Gesellschaft für Forschungsförderung Niederösterreich, GFF
Grant: FTI21-A-002
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Agency for Research Promotion of Lower Austria (GFF) under Project \u201CCourse scheduling in modular educational systems\u201D (Grant number FTI21-A-002). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback which greatly contributed to improving the original version of this paper.
Gesellschaft für Forschungsförderung Niederösterreich, GFF
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Agency for Research Promotion of Lower Austria (GFF) under Project \u201CCourse scheduling in modular educational systems\u201D (Grant number FTI21-A-002). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback which greatly contributed to improving the original version of this paper.
References 10 References
1 An Introduction to Educational Design Research, (2007)
2 Bell, Gordon H., Modular Course Design in Britain: Some Problems, Issues and Opportunities, journal of further and higher education, 17, 1, pp. 3-12, (1993)
3 Mazrekaj, Deni, The effect of modular education on school dropout, British Educational Research Journal, 46, 1, pp. 92-121, (2020)
4 Vidal-Rodeiro, Carmen L., Effects of modularity, certification session and re-sits on examination performance, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 19, 4, pp. 411-430, (2012)
5 Dills, Angela K., Course scheduling and academic performance, Economics of Education Review, 27, 6, pp. 646-654, (2008)
6 Li, Junmin, Modularisation in the German VET system: a study of policy implementation, Journal of Education and Work, 30, 5, pp. 471-485, (2017)
7 Pilz, Matthias, Modularisation of vocational training in Germany, Austria and Switzerland: Parallels and disparities in a modernisation process, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 64, 2, pp. 169-183, (2012)
8 Hedges, Mary R., What determines students' choices of elective modules?, International Review of Economics Education, 17, pp. 39-54, (2014)
9 Ceschia, Sara, Educational timetabling: Problems, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results, European Journal of Operational Research, 308, 1, pp. 1-18, (2023)
10 Wehrer, Anthony, The design and implementation of an interactive course-timetabling system, Annals of Operations Research, 218, 1, pp. 327-345, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers