Review Gold Open Access 2024

Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students' performance in education

Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Journal · Vol. 6 · Art. 100219
Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of activity-based learning and the utilization of ChatGPT on students' academic performance within the educational framework. Objectives: The study aims to assess the effectiveness of activity-based learning in comparison to traditional methods, while also evaluating the potential benefits and drawbacks of integrating ChatGPT as an educational tool. Methods: The study employs a comparative approach, analyzing the outcomes of students exposed to activity-based learning versus those using conventional methods. Additionally, the study examines the usage of ChatGPT in education through surveys and trials to determine its contribution to personalized feedback, interactive learning, and innovative teaching methods. Results: The findings reveal that activity-based learning enhances students' engagement, motivation, and critical thinking skills. Students participating in activity-based learning demonstrate improved academic achievement, which is attributed to their active involvement and practical application of knowledge. Similarly, the integration of ChatGPT offers novel avenues for interactive learning and individualized assistance, fostering students' understanding and exploration of complex concepts. Conclusion: In conclusion, activity-based learning proves to be a student-centered approach that enhances learning outcomes by fostering active participation and practical engagement. The utilization of ChatGPT in education showcases its potential to enhance educational experiences through interactive conversations and innovative teaching methodologies, despite considerations regarding potential limitations and ethical implications. © 2024 The Authors

Keywords

Author Keywords

ChatGPT Activity-based learning education AI NLP

Index Keywords

Learning systems Students academic performance Educational technology Innovative teaching Student performance Interactive learning ChatGPT Educational tools Comparative approach Potential benefits Activity-based learning Exposed to
Author Affiliations
General Education Department, Liwa University, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Virtual University of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan
Department of Computer Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan
Faculty of Computing, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan
Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Al Ain University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Department of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan
Faculty of Engineering, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada
Faculty of Engineering, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada, Hodmas University College, Mogadishu, Somalia, Bridges for Academic Excellence, Tunis, Ville, Tunisia, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abideen, Zain Ul, Analysis of Enrollment Criteria in Secondary Schools Using Machine Learning and Data Mining Approach, Electronics (Switzerland), 12, 3, (2023)
2 Impact of Activity Based Method on the Performance of Science Learners from Selected Junior Secondary Schools in Nigeria, (2017)
3 Towards Human Bot Collaborative Software Architecting with Chatgpt, (2023)
4 Flag Finding Line Anomalies in Code with Generative AI, (2023)
5 Pakistan Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Pjere, (2021)
6 Preprints, (2023)
7 ALEXANDER, PATRICIA A., Thinking Critically and Analytically about Critical-Analytic Thinking: an Introduction, Educational Psychology Review, 26, 4, pp. 469-476, (2014)
8 Journal of Global Hospitality and Tourism, (2023)
9 Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, (2015)
10 Anders, Brent A., Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking?, Patterns, 4, 3, (2023)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
129
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers