Article Gold Open Access 2024

Reviewing Assessment in Online and Blended Flipped Classroom

Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal · Vol. 21 · Issue 7
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the guiding principles, practises, and challenges of assessment in online and blended flipped classroom approaches in higher education. Based on that, we proposed a generic model of teaching, learning and assessment in online and blended flipped classroom, including examples of teaching and learning activities, with corresponding levels of learning outcomes, and assessment tasks and methods. We synthesised the findings and suggested further research on the following aspects: peer-assessment and self-assessment; benefits and challenges of educational technology; ethical aspects of assessment and plagiarism; balance between flexibility and structure. We recommended that further research should put more focus on the utility, including validity and reliability of assessment and test the proposed generic model in different study fields and educational contexts. Our study was based on a systematic literature review, including 90 articles identified in the Web of Science database, with 23 studied in detail. © by the authors,.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Organization and Informatics, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
The Open University, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
Funding & Acknowledgements
European Commission, EC
Grant: 2020-1-HR01-KA266-HE-094677
The authors disclose that they have no actual or perceived conflicts of interest. The study was supported by the project \u2018Relevant assessment and pedagogies for inclusive digital education\u2019, financed from the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union (2020-1-HR01-KA266-HE-094677). The authors have produced this manuscript without artificial intelligence support.
European Commission, EC
The authors disclose that they have no actual or perceived conflicts of interest. The study was supported by the project \u2018Relevant assessment and pedagogies for inclusive digital education\u2019, financed from the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union (2020-1-HR01-KA266-HE-094677). The authors have produced this manuscript without artificial intelligence support.
References 10 References
1 Alqassab, Maryam, A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements, Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1, (2023)
2 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, (1985)
3 A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing A Revision of Bloom S Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, (2001)
4 Arruabarrena, Rosa, Integration of good practices of active methodologies with the reuse of student-generated content, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1, (2019)
5 Bennett, Sue J., How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers, British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 2, pp. 672-682, (2017)
6 Higher Education Research and Development, (1999)
7 Blau, Ina, Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation, Computers and Education, 115, pp. 69-81, (2017)
8 Flipping the Classroom, (2013)
9 Brady, Mairead, Academic staff perspectives on technology for assessment (TfA) in higher education: A systematic literature review, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 6, pp. 3080-3098, (2019)
10 Bye, Robin T., The teacher as a facilitator for learning: Flipped classroom in a master's course on artificial intelligence, CSEDU 2017 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, pp. 184-195, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers