Article Gold Open Access 2024

Low-Cost Simulations and Augmented Reality: Enhancing Practical Learning in e-Learning Environments

Electronic Journal of e-Learning
Journal · Vol. 22 · Issue 3 · pp. 175-195
Abstract

This study aims to enhance engineering education by introducing a cost-effective simulation approach that combines cardboard prototyping and augmented reality (AR) as alternatives to traditional wood-based practice. The primary objective is to determine whether these tools can improve students’ technical skills, work attitudes, and overall learning performance in woodworking design within a vocational education context. The study addresses a critical challenge in e-learning: providing interactive and tangible experiences without relying solely on digital devices or high-cost materials. The study comprised 32 second-semester students from a vocational engineering program, separated into Group A (conventional learning using wood) and Group B (simulation-based learning utilizing cardboard and AR integration). Both groups adhered to the Conceive–Design–Implement–Operate (CDIO) structure throughout their learning sessions. Quantitative data were gathered using structured observation rubrics that evaluated four primary indicators: technical execution, planning accuracy, collaboration, and professionalism. The findings indicate that Group B, which employed cardboard simulations augmented with AR overlays, attained an average performance score of 8607, in contrast to 7350 for Group A. Group B exhibited enhanced planning, lower error rates, and more robust work attitudes. Feedback obtained from reflection sheets corroborated pupils’ enhanced comprehension of spatial concepts and safety protocols. This study advocates for e-learning methodologies by introducing a novel hybrid paradigm that integrates physical simulation with digital support via AR. It mitigates the shortcomings of entirely online or exclusively digital learning systems by incorporating physical, manipulable elements into the virtual learning experience. This method enables students to engage with tangible items while obtaining digital instruction, connecting cognitive design with physical implementation. This work enhances the e-learning sector by integrating accessible physical simulation with AR technology, presenting a practical model suitable for low-resource settings. It illustrates that practical, low-tech resources—when enhanced by smart digital integration—can yield quantifiable educational improvements and promote the cultivation of vital engineering skills. © The Authors.

Keywords

Author Keywords

blended learning Engineering education E-learning Cardboard simulation CDIO method Digital learning integration Practical skills development

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Building Engineering Education, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Timor, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Timor, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Shah, Syed Faisal Abbas, Integrating educational theories with virtual reality: Enhancing engineering education and VR laboratories, Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10, (2024)
2 Acevedo, Pedro, A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in STEM Education: Advantages and Disadvantages on Learning and User Experience, IEEE Access, 12, pp. 189359-189386, (2024)
3 Al-Khresheh, Mohammad Hamad, Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, (2024)
4 Al-Zoubi, Abdallah Y., The Middle East Higher Education Experience: Implementing Remote Labs to Improve the Acquisition of Skills in Industry 4.0, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, pp. 982-991, (2024)
5 Alarcon-Pereira, Grecia, The evolution of sustainability in engineering education research: a longitudinal analysis through bibliometrics and the CDIO initiative, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24, 6, pp. 1266-1289, (2023)
6 AlGerafi, Mohammed A.M., Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education, Electronics (Switzerland), 12, 18, (2023)
7 Amarasinghe, Isuri Tamura, Development of a material circularity evaluation framework for building construction projects, Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, (2024)
8 Anderson, Rachel, Thematic and textual analysis methods for developing social validity questionnaires in applied behavior analysis, Behavioral Interventions, 37, 3, pp. 732-753, (2022)
9 Ataş, Amine Hatun, A shared metacognition-focused instructional design model for online collaborative learning environments, Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 1, pp. 567-613, (2025)
10 Beldad, Ardion D., Introducing a framework for designing an interdisciplinary engineering curriculum: educating new engineers for complex sociotechnical challenges, European Journal of Engineering Education, 51, 1, pp. 192-209, (2026)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers