Article Gold Open Access 2024

Governing European educational research through ideas? Incremental ideational change in the European Union's Framework Programme (1994–2020)

European Journal of Education
Journal · Vol. 59 · Issue 1 · Art. e12579
Abstract

The European Union Framework Programme (EUFP) is the most institutionalised form of supranational thematic programming in the world and the centrepiece of European Union research policy. Since 1994, the EUFP has also funded collaborative research projects in the social sciences. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to its genesis, development, and effects in shaping the development of European science, especially examined by discipline or multidisciplinary fields. The EUFP is thus analysed here through an instruments-as-institutions approach that conceptualises the EUFP as an institution. Content analysis of the official documents of each funding cycle (n = 5) and a sample of European-funded educational research projects (n = 122) was analysed in conducting this research. The results show incremental ideational change of the EUFP's guiding ideas: from knowledge as an instrument to knowledge as a resource; within-the-EU to outside-the-EU internationalisation; and cooperation to an integration rationale of Europeanisation from the EUFP4 and EUFP5 (1994–2002) to the EUFP6 onwards (2002–2020). European-funded educational research contents are shaped by such representations of what is expected of European research. If the policy instrument steers European-funded educational research, ideas more than regulatory features significantly—though incrementally—change the direction of European social science. © 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Education published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Educational research European Union Framework Programme incremental ideational change policy instruments research policy

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Funding & Acknowledgements
Université du Luxembourg
I would like to thank colleagues at the Hertie School (Lukas Graf, Anna Prisca Lohse, Anne-Clémence Le Noan, and Flavio Balistreri) and at the University of Luxembourg (Justin J.W. Powell, Mike Zapp, and Jennifer Dusdal) for fruitful discussions and comments to early versions of this paper. I thank the three anonymous reviewers for their highly constructive feedback.
References 10 References
1 Aman, Valeria, A bibliometric view on the internationalization of European educational research, European Educational Research Journal, 16, 6, pp. 843-868, (2017)
2 Ball, Stephen John, Commericalising education: profiting from reform!, Journal of Education Policy, 33, 5, pp. 587-589, (2018)
3 Beerkens, Eric, The emergence and institutionalisation of the European higher education and research area, European Journal of Education, 43, 4, pp. 407-425, (2008)
4 Carrots Sticks and Sermons Policy Instruments and their Evaluation, (1998)
5 Great Transformations Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, (2002)
6 Introductory Paper the Missing Link Policy Ideas and Policy Instruments, (2010)
7 Braun, Virginia, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, pp. 77-101, (2006)
8 Campbell, John L., Ideas, politics, and public policy, Annual Review of Sociology, 28, pp. 21-38, (2002)
9 Campbell, John L., Institutional Change and Globalization, Institutional Change and Globalization, pp. 1-247, (2020)
10 Carstensen, Martin Bæk, Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change, Political Studies, 59, 3, pp. 596-615, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers