Article Green Open Access 2024

Consent practices in midwifery: A survey of UK midwives

Midwifery
Journal · Vol. 129 · Art. 103893
Abstract

Objective: To explore midwives’ knowledge and understanding of the law and practice of consent in the post-Montgomery world. Design: Cross-sectional online survey. Descriptive statistical analysis of midwives’ survey responses. Settings: Social media: Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. Survey distribution was via the UCL Opinio survey platform. Participants: A total of 402 midwives, surveyed over a four month period between 2nd March and 2nd July 2021. Measurements: Knowledge of legal consent, ‘sureness’ of meeting current legal requirements and competence to gain consent. Findings: 91% of participants acknowledged correctly that consent must be voluntary. 91% reported that women must be informed of all the risks associated with their care, although 26% reported that women should be informed of some of the risks associated with their care. Most participants were ‘sure’ that their discussions of consent meet current legal requirements (91%). 21% rated their competence to gain consent as ‘excellent’, 71% rated themselves as ‘very good’, whilst 1% rated their competence as ‘poor’. Deficiencies in fundamental knowledge of consent were noted in some participants rating themselves highest in ‘sureness’ of meeting legal requirements and competence to consent. Key conclusions: Fundamental gaps in midwives’ knowledge of legal consent were identified. Participants demonstrated uncertainty regarding the extent of risk disclosure and discussion of alternative care options. Participants generally rated themselves highly in their consenting practices, despite lacking in basic knowledge of legal consent, revealing a discrepancy between midwives’ self-perceptions and their actual knowledge. Implications for practice: The overconfidence displayed by some participants is concerning for clinical midwifery practice. Professional education and guidance for midwives on legal consent in keeping with Montgomery is urgently required to ensure that midwives are legally compliant in their consenting practices. © 2023

Keywords

Author Keywords

knowledge Consent survey Legal Midwives Montgomery

Index Keywords

cross-sectional study female human questionnaire Cross-Sectional Studies Humans Surveys and Questionnaires Article interpersonal communication Vocational education self concept education United Kingdom knowledge midwife pregnancy Social media Midwifery law overconfidence informed consent nurse midwife Nurse Midwives
Author Affiliations
Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ball, Lauren Elizabeth, Development of a validated questionnaire to measure the self-perceived competence of primary health professionals in providing nutrition care to patients with chronic disease, Family Practice, 32, 6, pp. 706-710, (2015)
2 Baltar, Fabiola, Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook, Internet Research, 22, 1, pp. 57-74, (2012)
3 Boynton, Petra Monica, Hands-on guide to questionnaire research: Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire, British Medical Journal, 328, 7451, pp. 1312-1315, (2004)
4 Chan, Sarah W., Montgomery and informed consent: Where are we now?, BMJ (Online), 357, (2017)
5 Chandratilake, Madawa N., Assessment of medical knowledge: The pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions, National Medical Journal of India, 24, 4, pp. 225-228, (2011)
6 Charan, Jaykaran, How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research?, Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35, 2, pp. 121-126, (2013)
7 undefined, (2012)
8 Cook, Angela M., Midwifery perspectives: The consent process in the context of patient safety and medico-legal issues, Clinical Risk, 22, 1-2, pp. 25-29, (2016)
9 Devaney, Sarah, The far-reaching implications of Montgomery for risk disclosure in practice, Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 24, 1, pp. 25-29, (2019)
10 Farrell, Anne Maree, Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, Journal of Medical Ethics, 42, 2, pp. 85-88, (2016)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers